Skip to content

JD

My feedback

14 results found

  1. 3,631 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    JD commented  · 

    This reflects a profound contempt for your customers

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    JD commented  · 

    It's embarrassing that you are working on stupid nonsense like Wallet before giving a go at a linux client for Drive. While it is true that linux desktop users are not as numerous as Windows/MacOS desktop users, they are quite influential and literal evangelists when it comes to spreading knowledge about software.

    JD supported this idea  · 
  2. 11 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    JD commented  · 

    +1 This is absolutely demented. I can't add my AMEX because it has both a CVC and a "security code", which are distinct and used in different contexts. Fix this nonsense.

    JD supported this idea  · 
  3. 1,359 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    JD supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    JD commented  · 

    This is the only reason why I am currently forced to stay with Keeper.

  4. 145 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    JD commented  · 

    If the US's or NATO's posture towards... Proton... is such that they would consider taking away their domain, you can rest assured that the domain itself is the least of your problems, or Proton's.
    Proton is only allowed to exist until Google, a US controlled entity, is willing to deliver to and accept e-mails from it. Nobody would use it if it were to be blacklisted.
    If the US were to sanction Proton, Proton would cease to exist within the hour - regardless of the domain name.

  5. 453 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    JD commented  · 

    Guided steps:

    1. Print to PDF

  6. 356 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    JD commented  · 

    If someone knows your password and has access to your second factor (TOTP and/or security keys) you are already so compromised that they probably know what you had for breakfast and can watch you when you go to the toilet. They will know all your aliases, and then some.

    This suggestion is naive and misguided. Saying that you want a secret username because you fear you won't be able to keep secret two authentication factors is very silly not to mention contradictory.

  7. 328 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    JD commented  · 

    If someone other than you has access to your unlocked Windows session you are doomed anyway. They can user-install (no admin) something that takes a screenshot every 5 seconds and posts it somewhere.

    This suggestion is very silly. Windows is not a mobile OS, once the session is unlocked everything is fair game.

  8. 1,064 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    JD supported this idea  · 
  9. 521 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    JD supported this idea  · 
  10. 61 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    JD supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    JD commented  · 

    Absolutely essential

  11. 13 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    JD commented  · 

    -1 This reveals a very naive view of the security landscape

  12. 148 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    JD commented  · 

    The current state of affairs is *very* questionable. Prioritize this.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    JD commented  · 

    The fact that in order to have security key 2FA you need to also enable TOTP is terminally stupid.
    Fix it.

    JD supported this idea  · 
  13. 139 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    JD commented  · 

    Bear in mind that this will also set you apart from Gmail. Google can't be arsed to write a native Apple Watch Gmail app. You could outdo them not just on the privacy front, but on the features offered.

    JD supported this idea  · 
  14. 329 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    JD supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base