JD

My feedback

14 results found

  1. 8 votes
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    JD commented  · 

    +1 This is absolutely demented. I can't add my AMEX because it has both a CVC and a "security code", which are distinct and used in different contexts. Fix this nonsense.

    JD supported this idea  · 
  2. 178 votes
    How important is this to you?
    JD supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    JD commented  · 

    Of course. This lack of light mode is downright stupid - please fix

  3. 1,115 votes
    How important is this to you?
    JD supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    JD commented  · 

    This is the only reason why I am currently forced to stay with Keeper.

  4. 100 votes
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    JD commented  · 

    If the US's or NATO's posture towards... Proton... is such that they would consider taking away their domain, you can rest assured that the domain itself is the least of your problems, or Proton's.
    Proton is only allowed to exist until Google, a US controlled entity, is willing to deliver to and accept e-mails from it. Nobody would use it if it were to be blacklisted.
    If the US were to sanction Proton, Proton would cease to exist within the hour - regardless of the domain name.

  5. 327 votes
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    JD commented  · 

    Guided steps:

    1. Print to PDF

  6. 267 votes
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    JD commented  · 

    If someone knows your password and has access to your second factor (TOTP and/or security keys) you are already so compromised that they probably know what you had for breakfast and can watch you when you go to the toilet. They will know all your aliases, and then some.

    This suggestion is naive and misguided. Saying that you want a secret username because you fear you won't be able to keep secret two authentication factors is very silly not to mention contradictory.

  7. 260 votes
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    JD commented  · 

    If someone other than you has access to your unlocked Windows session you are doomed anyway. They can user-install (no admin) something that takes a screenshot every 5 seconds and posts it somewhere.

    This suggestion is very silly. Windows is not a mobile OS, once the session is unlocked everything is fair game.

  8. 800 votes
    How important is this to you?
    JD supported this idea  · 
  9. 417 votes
    How important is this to you?
    JD supported this idea  · 
  10. 57 votes
    How important is this to you?
    JD supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    JD commented  · 

    Absolutely essential

  11. 12 votes
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    JD commented  · 

    -1 This reveals a very naive view of the security landscape

  12. 138 votes
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    JD commented  · 

    The current state of affairs is *very* questionable. Prioritize this.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    JD commented  · 

    The fact that in order to have security key 2FA you need to also enable TOTP is terminally stupid.
    Fix it.

    JD supported this idea  · 
  13. 132 votes
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    JD commented  · 

    Bear in mind that this will also set you apart from Gmail. Google can't be arsed to write a native Apple Watch Gmail app. You could outdo them not just on the privacy front, but on the features offered.

    JD supported this idea  · 
  14. 293 votes
    How important is this to you?
    JD supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base