JD
My feedback
12 results found
-
19 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment -
110 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment JD commentedGuided steps:
1. Print to PDF
-
817 votesJD supported this idea ·
-
141 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment JD commentedIf someone knows your password and has access to your second factor (TOTP and/or security keys) you are already so compromised that they probably know what you had for breakfast and can watch you when you go to the toilet. They will know all your aliases, and then some.
This suggestion is naive and misguided. Saying that you want a secret username because you fear you won't be able to keep secret two authentication factors is very silly not to mention contradictory.
-
136 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment JD commentedIf someone other than you has access to your unlocked Windows session you are doomed anyway. They can user-install (no admin) something that takes a screenshot every 5 seconds and posts it somewhere.
This suggestion is very silly. Windows is not a mobile OS, once the session is unlocked everything is fair game.
-
324 votesJD supported this idea ·
-
377 votesJD supported this idea ·
-
106 votesJD supported this idea ·
An error occurred while saving the comment JD commentedAbsolutely essential
-
14 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment JD commented-1 This reveals a very naive view of the security landscape
-
236 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment JD commentedThe current state of affairs is *very* questionable. Prioritize this.
An error occurred while saving the comment JD commentedThe fact that in order to have security key 2FA you need to also enable TOTP is terminally stupid.
Fix it.JD supported this idea · -
282 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment JD commentedBear in mind that this will also set you apart from Gmail. Google can't be arsed to write a native Apple Watch Gmail app. You could outdo them not just on the privacy front, but on the features offered.
JD supported this idea · -
193 votesJD supported this idea ·
If the US's or NATO's posture towards... Proton... is such that they would consider taking away their domain, you can rest assured that the domain itself is the least of your problems, or Proton's.
Proton is only allowed to exist until Google, a US controlled entity, is willing to deliver to and accept e-mails from it. Nobody would use it if it were to be blacklisted.
If the US were to sanction Proton, Proton would cease to exist within the hour - regardless of the domain name.