tsutsun
My feedback
16 results found
-
198 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment tsutsun
supported this idea
·
-
20 votestsutsun
supported this idea
·
-
152 votestsutsun
supported this idea
·
-
43 votestsutsun
supported this idea
·
-
408 votestsutsun
supported this idea
·
-
682 votestsutsun
supported this idea
·
-
2,755 votestsutsun
supported this idea
·
-
29 votestsutsun
supported this idea
·
-
112 votestsutsun
supported this idea
·
-
4,262 votestsutsun
supported this idea
·
-
1,415 votestsutsun
supported this idea
·
-
1,266 votestsutsun
supported this idea
·
-
520 votestsutsun
supported this idea
·
-
2,870 votestsutsun
supported this idea
·
-
169 votestsutsun
supported this idea
·
-
2,161 votes
We have given this quite a bit of thought, but at the present moment, it is not clear the advantages would outweigh the disadvantages.
The biggest problem is search. Encrypting all metadata would break metadata search entirely on the web client as there is still no efficient way to handle search of encrypted data within a browser.
Secondly, metadata encryption’s value from a privacy standpoint is also somewhat dubious. Because we ultimately must deliver the message to the recipient, we must know who the recipient is. At the current time, there still isn’t any proven and viable way to work around this.
Metadata encryption is an area of continued research for us, and when the opportunity arises and the technology for doing this matures, we will definitely implement it in ProtonMail.
tsutsun
supported this idea
·
I need only mail plus and pass plus.
I don't need ultimate or visionary or family plan.
I don't need calendar, drive or vpn.
But I cannot manage to choose the services I need.
It feels like we have to pay for unused/unneeded services.