Siglo XIX
My feedback
7 results found
-
45 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment -
127 votes
-
336 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment You could just shamirs secret share your password and give it to multiple people.
-
303 votes
-
760 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment HTTP3 is a real thing, Web3 is a poorly constructed scam by a person who once raised money selling people on the idea he could emulate a quantum computer and use it to mine BTC. He used his Bitcoin Magazine to popularize one of the worst implementations possible for their concept.
No one wants to pay per function call. And why would you run every ******* piece of software every time you load the blockchain on a new computer? The design could not be worse.
Why has the only things ever been successful are useless like Cryptocats, or NFTs?
Both of which don't even require a blockchain, also if you rollback your blockchain, why even have one? Just used a ******* quorum based ledger.
And I helped build PoS, and its a bad idea, it just creates oligarchies. That is the long term trend. The distribution is also very racist and benefits already well off people. Its a ******* joke.
You could do NFTs with just asymmetric encryption; what people like you don't get is buying crypto doesn't make you a cryptographer. Or an expert in p2p networks, or computer science.
Asymmetric encryption and the Markov tree are the two important key technologies behind Bitcoin; thats why its Bitcoin (as in BitTorrent, one of the first popular uses of the Markov Tree) and not ******* Blockcoin.
For **** sake, I almost guarantee you can not explain what a blockchain is in a cogent sentence. You should only need one too. Also why does the blockchain exist? Do you even understand the problem it is addressing? Its supposed to prevent people like bankers from rolling back the transactions when they put 150 million into a stupid ******* contract that I saw had a bug in it, despite them paying a company 150 million to rubber stamp that its secure; never bothering to ******* test it, they could have ran a ******* test for a year before putting 150 million into a ******* novel contract.
Even if they did implement their system correctly, why would you ever use it? Why wouldn't you fork it if you wanted to run software on it?
Its looking like I will need to invest some time in embarrassing the idiots who run that scam again.
-
931 votes
-
698 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment I really really really want this feature. I could easily get big files like music projects from novice computer users.
This is just one example of the many things it would enable me to do. I would use the service more and buy more space.
Why not just convert those to Bitcoin? Why should they waste time adding massive security holes to the system because you are too lazy to use an exchange?