Skip to content

Eduardo

My feedback

4 results found

  1. 627 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Eduardo supported this idea  · 
  2. 1,158 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Eduardo supported this idea  · 
  3. 87 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Eduardo commented  · 

    I would like to add that a similar implementation from tailscale.
    With Twingate (my preferred solution) they use what they call "controller". That would allow to acess resources on private networks, where the controller is deployed.

    This is a critical feature for business customers IMHO
    https://www.twingate.com/docs/how-twingate-works

    Eduardo supported this idea  · 
  4. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Eduardo shared this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base