Bird
My feedback
32 results found
-
654 votes
Bird
supported this idea
·
-
539 votes
Bird
supported this idea
·
-
935 votes
Bird
supported this idea
·
-
821 votes
Bird
supported this idea
·
-
891 votes
Bird
supported this idea
·
-
1,200 votes
Bird
supported this idea
·
-
786 votes
Bird
supported this idea
·
-
76 votes
Bird
supported this idea
·
-
210 votes
Bird
supported this idea
·
-
219 votes
Bird
supported this idea
·
-
535 votes
Bird
supported this idea
·
-
1,723 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Bird
supported this idea
·
This should be prioritized if we (the community) want to be really fully private and own our lives and lifes.
I am not against censuring the current notification system, but extend it, like for example Signal does by supporting FCM (Google), Websockets and UnifiedPush.
I will share my most honest opinion:
- FCM is efficent and I think proton does not want to quit/remove it because many users still use android stock system. I'm ok with this.
- Websocket is trash (at least used by Signal). When I used websockets with Signal my pixel battery seemed being drained. For me it is a no-go this way.
- UnifiedPush is suprisedly efficient, I am currently using Molly on a GOS pixel and the battery usage of Molly/ntfy is almost none on background.
Please Proton, I'm not against removing FCM, but please think about extend efficient protocol like UnifiedPush on your applications so users like me who are not being notified with new emails or login account attempts can benefit of all your features (since with the current status we only benefit of half/partial features, i am missing critical email notifications constantly...).
Also IMO it would be a "bang one's fist on the table" to all the privacy community (not only Proton) and a smart "reason to join Proton"