Migration
My feedback
48 results found
-
1 vote
Migration shared this idea ·
-
1 vote
Migration shared this idea ·
-
1 vote
Migration shared this idea ·
-
5 votes
Migration shared this idea ·
-
112 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Migration supported this idea ·
-
3 votes
Migration shared this idea ·
-
4 votes
Migration shared this idea ·
-
2 votes
Migration shared this idea ·
-
71 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Migration commented
Add a built-in search feature inside the cloud storage application that allows users to search only within the cloud environment.
Currently, users can rely on the operating system’s global search, but this is not always convenient and may return results outside the cloud scope. An internal search would allow users to quickly find files and folders directly within their cloud storage without leaving the app or filtering system-wide results.
Migration supported this idea ·
-
1,956 votes
As per the Spring/Summer Roadmap, this is being developed: https://proton.me/blog/pass-roadmap-spring-summer-2026
Folders will be a significant building block for Proton Pass that will go beyond just helping you organize your items. Introducing folders will require some rethinking of our cryptography model, which we’re currently working on. Eventually, you’ll also be able to share folders and subfolders just like your vaults and individual items, giving you another flexible way to share access.
Folders will be available in the coming months. As well as creating vaults, you’ll be able to create dedicated folders and subfolders to organize crucial information for quick retrieval: you can organize by project, by team, by year, or whatever else you need.
Migration supported this idea ·
-
4 votes
Migration shared this idea ·
-
2 votes
Migration shared this idea ·
-
709 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Migration commented
I agree that if it were proton.com (which is unavailable and they tried to get it) or p.com, that would be great. But there's no need to say 'this would be better.' It can't be better, because this isn't about the devs not wanting it. If you think 'this would be cool,' then go get the domain for Proton yourself and donate it. Everyone will say thanks.
And the fact that pm.me isn't available to everyone and isn't recognizable is fine. What's the alternative, handing it out to every scammer so ProtonMail ends up on blocklists of tons of services and even entire countries? By the way, I can't even register a ProtonMail address with Chime bank, because they think scammers use an 'anonymous service.' And that's logical. In the past, people using Proton sent bomb threats and emails to schools and malls. As a result, many just added a service that refused to disclose user data to their blocklists.
So decide for yourself: do you want secure communication, or do you want service recognition?
-
26 votes
Migration supported this idea ·
An error occurred while saving the comment Migration commented
I also use Surface on ARM and think it is the future for laptops. Would be nice to get the app on ARM and with autoupdates or at Windows Store.
-
51 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Migration commented
Yeah, for the windows app it would be great. I want to use Windows Hello and have the autolock feature when i am out of my laptop. And need more flexible options for this. For instance i use auto unlock my laptop when my phone is near. So i don't want to unlock the proton mail app when my laptop wasn't locked after my last protonmail unlock operation.
Migration supported this idea ·
-
2 votes
Migration shared this idea ·
-
680 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Migration commented
it's impossible to be better than Telegram. And it costs a lot of money.
-
2 votes
Migration shared this idea ·
-
6 votes
Migration shared this idea ·
-
4 votes
Migration shared this idea ·
When saving a file with the same name in Proton Drive on Android, the app does not prompt the user to choose an action. Instead, it automatically creates a duplicate file with a "(1)" suffix.
Expected behavior is to show a dialog with options: overwrite the existing file, rename the new file, or cancel the operation.
Current behavior leads to unnecessary duplicates and reduces control over file management.