H
My feedback
15 results found
-
4 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment H
supported this idea
·
-
4 votesH
supported this idea
·
-
268 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment H
commented
Would be good to have the transparency of models used, not necessary for each and every interaction, but as another user suggested, "hidden transparency", or in my own words, "veiled transparency", the ability to take a peek at which model is giving the answer. I have a subscription for Lumo+ and generally I love it, it adapts to the user. Since the 2.0 update it seems to be making more 'assumptions' rather than asking for clarification, and was frankly rude. I personally never thought an AI would actually offend me, it did. Copilot went this way eventually, and when it did, I deleted any chat history and completely stopped using it. Hopefully Lumo+ will retain it's 'personality' and lose the 'attitude'. A few minor tweaks could fix this, thanks!
H
supported this idea
·
-
798 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment H
commented
Great idea! Especially if Lumo+ remains available and Optional, and clearly visible, not just a simple toggle switch, would be "convenient" privacy, and efficient!
H
supported this idea
·
-
5 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment H
commented
I agree with Kevin on this completely!! Lumo+ 2.0 layout is clean, but removing that bottom (or top) navigation window icon and leaving it only in the top left is disruptive to workflow. Please keep it available on screen as suggested. The elegance of simplicity is fewer clicks, not more. The Ghost Mode is now a toggle, never quite sure its activated for one-offs. How about putting it as a separate line item or in the "tools" section? Thanks for your consideration!
H
supported this idea
·
-
2 votesH
supported this idea
·
-
3 votesH
supported this idea
·
-
359 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment H
commented
Love this idea! Makes for an even more organized, color coded, cross referenced workflow, and optional is ideal!
H
supported this idea
·
-
368 votesH
supported this idea
·
-
177 votesH
supported this idea
·
-
453 votesH
supported this idea
·
-
4,272 votesH
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment H
commented
Proton already has all the pieces — Mail, VPN, Calendar, Drive, Pass, Sentinel ad/tracker blocking. A lightweight, privacy-first Proton Browser would be a natural progression and complete the puzzle!
The concept: a browser where all Proton products are built in and ready to be activated at will. The user chooses what they want — one person wants the full suite, another just wants VPN and Pass. Makes is simple and even more customized for all.
The home page wouldn't need to be a search engine — Google, Bing, Yahoo, and DuckDuckGo have that covered. Instead, it could be a clean Proton app dashboard. Click the Mail icon for Mail, VPN is built in, and so on. Simple, elegant, and completely functional.
You already block ads and trackers. You already have Pass for passwords, cards and contacts. Download, ask once, and go. Include a Ghost Mode (like in Lumo) as a private page for one-offs and extra privacy.
No upselling, no ads — privacy sells itself. Let users try Proton and decide what they like. It wouldn't detract from the apps you've already built — it would complement and unify them.
It would be the most convenient private browser out there. All the app goodies in one bag, simple, clean, elegant, and of course, private. It's time to own your creation, embrace it, and share it.
-
3 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment H
commented
Right now there's no easy way to send feedback from within Lumo itself. I submitted a compliment through the bug report form as there was not a dedicated feedback option. Adding a simple feedback button in the navigation pane (and put that window pane slider back on the bottom to stop endless scrolling) would make it easy for users to share both praise and constructive suggestions — and you deserve to hear when you're doing a great job, because you are!
H
supported this idea
·
-
2 votesH
shared this idea
·
-
89 votesH
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment H
commented
Currently you can delete chats, but there's no option to rename them. For users who like to refine, re-organize, and manage their chat history, being able to rename chats would be very helpful. It would complement the Memory toggle and Projects features nicely by giving users more control over organizing their conversations.
Making this simpler is a great idea! I was able to take bits of info from computer and whole chats, copy/paste into projects box, double check they are there, then (my preference only here), deleted the old chat, which is now located in "projects". Making this a 2 click solution would be great!