---------------
My feedback
13 results found
-
66 votes---------------
supported this idea
·
-
2,571 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment -
406 votes---------------
supported this idea
·
-
1,275 votes---------------
supported this idea
·
-
129 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment ---------------
commented
Please don't do this, Proton. There is nothing gained by removing the .ch addresses, but there is clearly something to lose (such as critical email addresses) if removals are mandated and imposed. If someone does not want to use .ch addresses, then I suggest they simply avoid using the Swiss addresses.
-
1,190 votes---------------
supported this idea
·
-
723 votes---------------
supported this idea
·
-
2,110 votes
We have given this quite a bit of thought, but at the present moment, it is not clear the advantages would outweigh the disadvantages.
The biggest problem is search. Encrypting all metadata would break metadata search entirely on the web client as there is still no efficient way to handle search of encrypted data within a browser.
Secondly, metadata encryption’s value from a privacy standpoint is also somewhat dubious. Because we ultimately must deliver the message to the recipient, we must know who the recipient is. At the current time, there still isn’t any proven and viable way to work around this.
Metadata encryption is an area of continued research for us, and when the opportunity arises and the technology for doing this matures, we will definitely implement it in ProtonMail.
---------------
supported this idea
·
-
1,559 votes---------------
supported this idea
·
-
844 votes---------------
supported this idea
·
-
1,096 votes---------------
supported this idea
·
-
6,718 votes---------------
supported this idea
·
-
2,073 votes
Proton and Standard Notes are joining forces: https://proton.me/blog/proton-standard-notes-join-forces
---------------
supported this idea
·
Signal collab, right?