ProtoDucto
My feedback
39 results found
-
15 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment ProtoDucto
supported this idea
·
-
24 votesProtoDucto
supported this idea
·
-
255 votes
Hi everyone, this one is under consideration, pending anti-spam measures we might need to take.
ProtoDucto
supported this idea
·
-
252 votesProtoDucto
supported this idea
·
-
629 votesProtoDucto
supported this idea
·
-
607 votesProtoDucto
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment ProtoDucto
commented
No need to reinvent the wheel → implement LanguageTool, which is open source and very powerful.
-
660 votesProtoDucto
supported this idea
·
-
716 votesProtoDucto
supported this idea
·
-
4,889 votes
ProtonMail offers encrypted contacts for both web and mobile applications (https://protonmail.com/blog/encrypted-contacts-manager/). Calendar and note functionality will be released in the future.
ProtoDucto
supported this idea
·
-
6,681 votesProtoDucto
supported this idea
·
-
9,008 votes
Introducing Docs in Proton Drive – collaborative document editing that’s actually private: https://proton.me/blog/docs-proton-drive
With Docs you can:
- Write with privacy — Create and edit documents within Proton Drive, knowing your contents are only accessible to you and those you choose to share with.
- Share and invite anyone — Invite other users to view or edit your documents with a single click.
- Collaborate in real-time — Changes are reflected immediately, ensuring every contributor always sees the most up-to-date version.
- View cursors and presence indicators — See who else is viewing or editing the document, enhancing teamwork and communication.
- Leave comments and replies — Add comments to share feedback without editing the document. Comments are visible to all collaborators, keeping everyone in the loop.
- Import and export with ease — You can upload .docx documents, edit them, and download in various formats like .docx, .txt, .md, and HTML.
ProtoDucto
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment ProtoDucto
commented
I already said it, but acquiring a different project is, in my opinion, not the way to go. Independent projects are essential for a strong and resilient open source community.
Collaboration and cooperation are required though, as they help to promote different projects and raise the awareness of Open source. They can even allow for new standards or feature reach integrations. At least they should.
However, I support the initially posted idea, prefer/recommend Collabora Office though.
An error occurred while saving the comment ProtoDucto
commented
If such a thing happens, please, re-use already existing open source projects like Collabora Office, Cryptpad or OnlyOffice and do not reinvent the wheel from the ground up.
That's the spirit of Open source and allows for quicker development.Invite the community as soon as possible to speed up the development.
An error occurred while saving the comment ProtoDucto
commented
Use an already existing open source frame (like Cryptpad, OnlyOffice or Collabora Office/LibreOffice Online) to create an integrated and collaborative encrypted office suite.
Make it Open source from the very beginning and allow for the community to actively help the development and improvement of the project. Allow and encourage upstream contribution to the office projects.
(There are already three other ideas about an office suite (1. Cryptpad, 2. Onlyoffice and 3. LibreOffice. Merge the ideas into this one ?)
An error occurred while saving the comment ProtoDucto
commented
Collabora Office is also a viable, if not better option for a collaborative, integrated and encrypted open source office suite.
-
2,072 votes
We have given this quite a bit of thought, but at the present moment, it is not clear the advantages would outweigh the disadvantages.
The biggest problem is search. Encrypting all metadata would break metadata search entirely on the web client as there is still no efficient way to handle search of encrypted data within a browser.
Secondly, metadata encryption’s value from a privacy standpoint is also somewhat dubious. Because we ultimately must deliver the message to the recipient, we must know who the recipient is. At the current time, there still isn’t any proven and viable way to work around this.
Metadata encryption is an area of continued research for us, and when the opportunity arises and the technology for doing this matures, we will definitely implement it in ProtonMail.
ProtoDucto
supported this idea
·
-
1,701 votesProtoDucto
supported this idea
·
-
208 votesProtoDucto
supported this idea
·
-
358 votesProtoDucto
supported this idea
·
-
2,019 votesProtoDucto
supported this idea
·
-
371 votesProtoDucto
supported this idea
·
-
1,141 votesProtoDucto
supported this idea
·
-
1,463 votesProtoDucto
supported this idea
·
-
1,716 votesProtoDucto
supported this idea
·
Instead of having to rely on a PIN code or the Proton account password, add the possibility to unlock the Web app with a custom password.
In addition, on Linux, there could be a Secret Service integration, either requiring to unlock the app with KWallet, Gnome-Keyring, KeePassXC or a similar application. If possible, the Proton Pass app could prompt the user every time to input their password every time.