M
My feedback
8 results found
-
25 votesM
supported this idea
·
-
645 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment -
372 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment M
commented
Something similar to Kagi would be amazing. Buying Kagi and its team would be even better.
A web browser? No. There are already multiple good-quality privacy-focused browsers.
M
supported this idea
·
-
819 votesM
supported this idea
·
-
54 votesM
supported this idea
·
-
188 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment M
commented
Looks like people don't understand what AI means (AI is not something new at all), and are just scared of the word. It also feels like a lot of you don’t understand what e2e encrypted means…
Our data are encrypted, so as long as whatever AI features they add don't interfere with our privacy, there are *no* reasons to be against it.
AI and more specifically genAI is the next big thing whether people like it or not, if proton doesn't embrace it in some ways, the company will be out of business within the next 5 to 10 years. You wouldn’t pay to use a service that hasn’t changed since 1999 would you? It’s the same here, in 5 to 10 years AI will have completely changed how we write and respond to emails, how we find our files in our drive, how we look for pictures, and how we interact with tech in general. Proton must adapt, and there are ways to do this without being unethical or violating privacy.
It’s not because OpenAI and Google went the evil way that Proton can’t do it the right way. Want a proof? Y’all moved from Gmail to Proton for that specific reason. Just continue to trust Proton to do the right thing.
Saying that there are no reasons to innovate for the sake of innovating means you just don’t understand how the world works. Innovations are why we have electricity, internet, computers, vaccins, cars, movies, and don’t die at the old age of 30 years old.
Y’all need to educate yourself and stop being afraid of changes. Unfounded fears and conservatism always end up with ****** outcomes.
-
113 votesM
supported this idea
·
-
228 votesM
supported this idea
·
Read receipts already exist in protonmail and are implemented in a privacy-friendly way.
If you're asking for FORCING automatic background read receipts in a way that the recipients don't even know about them, then you are asking a privacy-focused company to add targeted tracking to their product as a feature...
Why are y'all even here for? Privacy for me, not for thee?