Peter Lam
My feedback
25 results found
-
141 votes
Peter Lam
supported this idea
·
-
3 votes
Peter Lam
supported this idea
·
-
349 votes
Peter Lam
supported this idea
·
-
516 votes
Peter Lam
supported this idea
·
-
772 votes
Peter Lam
supported this idea
·
-
2,493 votes
Peter Lam
supported this idea
·
-
72 votes
Peter Lam
supported this idea
·
-
26 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment -
172 votes
Peter Lam
supported this idea
·
-
155 votes
Peter Lam
supported this idea
·
-
512 votes
Peter Lam
supported this idea
·
-
627 votes
Peter Lam
supported this idea
·
-
1,934 votes
Peter Lam
supported this idea
·
-
2,122 votes
We have given this quite a bit of thought, but at the present moment, it is not clear the advantages would outweigh the disadvantages.
The biggest problem is search. Encrypting all metadata would break metadata search entirely on the web client as there is still no efficient way to handle search of encrypted data within a browser.
Secondly, metadata encryption’s value from a privacy standpoint is also somewhat dubious. Because we ultimately must deliver the message to the recipient, we must know who the recipient is. At the current time, there still isn’t any proven and viable way to work around this.
Metadata encryption is an area of continued research for us, and when the opportunity arises and the technology for doing this matures, we will definitely implement it in ProtonMail.
Peter Lam
supported this idea
·
-
3,726 votes
Peter Lam
supported this idea
·
-
134 votes
Peter Lam
supported this idea
·
-
106 votes
Peter Lam
supported this idea
·
-
202 votes
Peter Lam
supported this idea
·
-
566 votes
Peter Lam
supported this idea
·
-
152 votes
Peter Lam
supported this idea
·
The suffix should be controllable under the "Advanced options" in the alias creation screen. However you can't set a default suffix/domain at the moment.
You may check out this discussion as well.
https://protonmail.uservoice.com/forums/953584-proton-pass/suggestions/46868950-ability-to-select-default-alias-domain