Amber
My feedback
172 results found
-
15 votes
Amber
supported this idea
·
-
537 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Amber
supported this idea
·
-
659 votes
Amber
supported this idea
·
-
689 votes
Amber
supported this idea
·
-
744 votes
Amber
supported this idea
·
-
751 votes
Amber
supported this idea
·
-
1,149 votes
Amber
supported this idea
·
-
1,264 votes
Amber
supported this idea
·
-
1,411 votes
Amber
supported this idea
·
-
1,549 votes
Amber
supported this idea
·
-
1,870 votes
Amber
supported this idea
·
-
1,890 votes
Amber
supported this idea
·
-
2,107 votes
Amber
supported this idea
·
-
2,105 votes
Amber
supported this idea
·
-
2,196 votes
We have given this quite a bit of thought, but at the present moment, it is not clear the advantages would outweigh the disadvantages.
The biggest problem is search. Encrypting all metadata would break metadata search entirely on the web client as there is still no efficient way to handle search of encrypted data within a browser.
Secondly, metadata encryption’s value from a privacy standpoint is also somewhat dubious. Because we ultimately must deliver the message to the recipient, we must know who the recipient is. At the current time, there still isn’t any proven and viable way to work around this.
Metadata encryption is an area of continued research for us, and when the opportunity arises and the technology for doing this matures, we will definitely implement it in ProtonMail.
Amber
supported this idea
·
-
4,050 votes
Amber
supported this idea
·
-
5,318 votes
ProtonMail offers encrypted contacts for both web and mobile applications (https://protonmail.com/blog/encrypted-contacts-manager/). Calendar and note functionality will be released in the future.
Amber
supported this idea
·
-
6,843 votes
Amber
supported this idea
·
-
5 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Amber
commented
This is a massive privacy problem. If you send a password-protected email from an alias to someone, the body of the email will leak the main email of the Proton account.
This is defeats the purpose of sending protected emails from aliases.
Amber
supported this idea
·
-
6 votes
Amber
supported this idea
·
Caldav and Cardav are old protocols.
They were not designed to be private. As such, you cannot have them and encryption at the same time.
The reason why Google, Microsoft etc offer support for these protocols is because they literally spy on you.