Anders
My feedback
418 results found
-
472 votes
Anders
supported this idea
·
-
536 votes
Anders
supported this idea
·
-
315 votes
Anders
supported this idea
·
-
562 votes
Anders
supported this idea
·
-
963 votes
Anders
supported this idea
·
-
610 votes
Anders
supported this idea
·
-
661 votes
Anders
supported this idea
·
-
753 votes
Anders
supported this idea
·
-
672 votes
Anders
supported this idea
·
-
813 votes
Anders
supported this idea
·
-
756 votes
Anders
supported this idea
·
-
1,921 votes
Anders
supported this idea
·
-
2,120 votes
Anders
supported this idea
·
-
2,244 votes
Anders
supported this idea
·
-
2,202 votes
We have given this quite a bit of thought, but at the present moment, it is not clear the advantages would outweigh the disadvantages.
The biggest problem is search. Encrypting all metadata would break metadata search entirely on the web client as there is still no efficient way to handle search of encrypted data within a browser.
Secondly, metadata encryption’s value from a privacy standpoint is also somewhat dubious. Because we ultimately must deliver the message to the recipient, we must know who the recipient is. At the current time, there still isn’t any proven and viable way to work around this.
Metadata encryption is an area of continued research for us, and when the opportunity arises and the technology for doing this matures, we will definitely implement it in ProtonMail.
Anders
supported this idea
·
-
24 votes
Anders
supported this idea
·
-
46 votes
Anders
supported this idea
·
-
21 votes
Anders
supported this idea
·
-
83 votes
Anders
supported this idea
·
-
80 votes
Anders
supported this idea
·