S B
My feedback
51 results found
-
383 votes
S B supported this idea ·
-
398 votes
S B supported this idea ·
-
430 votes
S B supported this idea ·
-
484 votes
S B supported this idea ·
-
490 votes
S B supported this idea ·
-
496 votes
S B supported this idea ·
-
518 votes
S B supported this idea ·
-
527 votes
Sharing a calendar is available on Web.
On next iterations we would like to enable the editing permission on mobile apps and add in the future to only share the "busy" information
S B supported this idea ·
-
581 votes
S B supported this idea ·
-
549 votes
S B supported this idea ·
-
613 votes
S B supported this idea ·
-
618 votes
S B supported this idea ·
-
664 votes
S B supported this idea ·
-
712 votes
S B supported this idea ·
-
714 votes
S B supported this idea ·
-
937 votes
S B supported this idea ·
-
1,064 votes
S B supported this idea ·
-
997 votes
S B supported this idea ·
-
1,790 votes
S B supported this idea ·
-
2,087 votes
We have given this quite a bit of thought, but at the present moment, it is not clear the advantages would outweigh the disadvantages.
The biggest problem is search. Encrypting all metadata would break metadata search entirely on the web client as there is still no efficient way to handle search of encrypted data within a browser.
Secondly, metadata encryption’s value from a privacy standpoint is also somewhat dubious. Because we ultimately must deliver the message to the recipient, we must know who the recipient is. At the current time, there still isn’t any proven and viable way to work around this.
Metadata encryption is an area of continued research for us, and when the opportunity arises and the technology for doing this matures, we will definitely implement it in ProtonMail.
S B supported this idea ·