S B
My feedback
51 results found
-
395 votes
S B supported this idea ·
-
405 votes
S B supported this idea ·
-
441 votes
S B supported this idea ·
-
485 votes
S B supported this idea ·
-
509 votes
S B supported this idea ·
-
508 votes
S B supported this idea ·
-
528 votes
S B supported this idea ·
-
535 votes
Sharing a calendar is available on Web.
On next iterations we would like to enable the editing permission on mobile apps and add in the future to only share the "busy" information
S B supported this idea ·
-
591 votes
S B supported this idea ·
-
596 votes
S B supported this idea ·
-
620 votes
S B supported this idea ·
-
628 votes
S B supported this idea ·
-
669 votes
S B supported this idea ·
-
778 votes
S B supported this idea ·
-
735 votes
S B supported this idea ·
-
955 votes
S B supported this idea ·
-
1,095 votes
S B supported this idea ·
-
1,026 votes
S B supported this idea ·
-
1,874 votes
S B supported this idea ·
-
2,107 votes
We have given this quite a bit of thought, but at the present moment, it is not clear the advantages would outweigh the disadvantages.
The biggest problem is search. Encrypting all metadata would break metadata search entirely on the web client as there is still no efficient way to handle search of encrypted data within a browser.
Secondly, metadata encryption’s value from a privacy standpoint is also somewhat dubious. Because we ultimately must deliver the message to the recipient, we must know who the recipient is. At the current time, there still isn’t any proven and viable way to work around this.
Metadata encryption is an area of continued research for us, and when the opportunity arises and the technology for doing this matures, we will definitely implement it in ProtonMail.
S B supported this idea ·