Nathan
My feedback
16 results found
-
4 votesNathan
supported this idea
·
-
4 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Nathan
supported this idea
·
-
176 votesNathan
supported this idea
·
-
147 votesNathan
supported this idea
·
-
1,852 votesNathan
supported this idea
·
-
2,617 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Nathan
commented
I just posted a similar idea about partitioning data that takes this a good bit further, but this is exactly the kind of thing I am concerned about. Using a master password for universal access, while convenient, should at best only get your foot in the door if you wish to have enhanced security. Partitioning beyond that, or even working around that master password so that it can truly remain as a skeleton key, would both be improvements in a similar direction that would be very meaningful to me.
Nathan
supported this idea
·
-
372 votesNathan
supported this idea
·
-
486 votesNathan
supported this idea
·
-
1 voteNathan
shared this idea
·
-
58 votesNathan
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Nathan
commented
This would be amazing, especially if coupled with a privacy service to hide domain registration details from the whois database.
-
377 votesNathan
supported this idea
·
-
74 votesNathan
supported this idea
·
-
308 votesNathan
supported this idea
·
-
1 voteNathan
shared this idea
·
-
398 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Nathan
commented
This would be fantastic! I pay more than I'd like to admit to essentially have secondary numbers for the sake of keeping my primary one safe. If I could roll that in at a discount with my proton subscription and have a good privacy model to boot, I'd be all over it.
Imagine if proton was also cellular provider... like phreeli. Definitely some scope creep, but I'd love to see that on the "someday" dart board. Phreeli seems awesome but the prices are not competitive imo.
Nathan
supported this idea
·
-
555 votesNathan
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Nathan
commented
I'd like a good alternative to signal, or equally as good: signal network integration. It would be especially nice not to have to provide a phone number to use the service and to have multiple IDs for separation of concerns.
While I fully agree with your sentiments and the necessity to build or maintain trust with the community (which hinges upon improving communication patterns), I will point out that based upon your cited evidence, they're under no obligation to actually be transparent with their customers, only to fulfill the privacy promises made. For example, "all apps open source" does not imply the server backends, and the apps themselves have github repositories associated and freely accessible through proton's websites. So I see this as fulfilled.
I guess to be more precise, I do not feel that they're deliberately or deceitfully "hiding" anything, based upon the claims made here, but I do think that their communications patterns would serve to be improved. I do like that you aren't attempting to force them to change their practices around what they will and won't release, only in that they answer questions about what's going on and why, which is very important. My outsider observations thus far suggest that their actions are less in bad faith and more because they've only got so many hours in the day and there's competing priorities.