Skip to content

Nathan

My feedback

15 results found

  1. 5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Nathan supported this idea  · 
  2. 287 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Nathan supported this idea  · 
  3. 290 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Nathan supported this idea  · 
  4. 1,933 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Nathan supported this idea  · 
  5. 2,773 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Nathan commented  · 

    I just posted a similar idea about partitioning data that takes this a good bit further, but this is exactly the kind of thing I am concerned about. Using a master password for universal access, while convenient, should at best only get your foot in the door if you wish to have enhanced security. Partitioning beyond that, or even working around that master password so that it can truly remain as a skeleton key, would both be improvements in a similar direction that would be very meaningful to me.

    Nathan supported this idea  · 
  6. 594 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Nathan supported this idea  · 
  7. 717 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Nathan supported this idea  · 
  8. 3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Nathan shared this idea  · 
  9. 122 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Nathan supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Nathan commented  · 

    This would be amazing, especially if coupled with a privacy service to hide domain registration details from the whois database.

  10. 478 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Nathan supported this idea  · 
  11. 110 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Nathan supported this idea  · 
  12. 447 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Nathan supported this idea  · 
  13. 3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Nathan shared this idea  · 
  14. 568 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Nathan commented  · 

    This would be fantastic! I pay more than I'd like to admit to essentially have secondary numbers for the sake of keeping my primary one safe. If I could roll that in at a discount with my proton subscription and have a good privacy model to boot, I'd be all over it.

    Imagine if proton was also cellular provider... like phreeli. Definitely some scope creep, but I'd love to see that on the "someday" dart board. Phreeli seems awesome but the prices are not competitive imo.

    Nathan supported this idea  · 
  15. 809 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Nathan supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Nathan commented  · 

    I'd like a good alternative to signal, or equally as good: signal network integration. It would be especially nice not to have to provide a phone number to use the service and to have multiple IDs for separation of concerns.