Roger Ison-Haug
My feedback
80 results found
-
184 votes
Roger Ison-Haug
supported this idea
·
-
229 votes
Roger Ison-Haug
supported this idea
·
-
250 votes
Roger Ison-Haug
supported this idea
·
-
316 votes
Roger Ison-Haug
supported this idea
·
-
417 votes
Roger Ison-Haug
supported this idea
·
-
495 votes
Roger Ison-Haug
supported this idea
·
-
756 votes
Roger Ison-Haug
supported this idea
·
-
3 votes
Roger Ison-Haug
shared this idea
·
-
2,814 votes
Roger Ison-Haug
supported this idea
·
-
1,094 votes
Roger Ison-Haug
supported this idea
·
-
1,244 votes
Roger Ison-Haug
supported this idea
·
-
538 votes
Roger Ison-Haug
supported this idea
·
-
1,584 votes
Roger Ison-Haug
supported this idea
·
-
873 votes
Roger Ison-Haug
supported this idea
·
-
278 votes
Roger Ison-Haug
supported this idea
·
-
455 votes
Roger Ison-Haug
supported this idea
·
-
3,417 votes
Roger Ison-Haug
supported this idea
·
-
2,161 votes
We have given this quite a bit of thought, but at the present moment, it is not clear the advantages would outweigh the disadvantages.
The biggest problem is search. Encrypting all metadata would break metadata search entirely on the web client as there is still no efficient way to handle search of encrypted data within a browser.
Secondly, metadata encryption’s value from a privacy standpoint is also somewhat dubious. Because we ultimately must deliver the message to the recipient, we must know who the recipient is. At the current time, there still isn’t any proven and viable way to work around this.
Metadata encryption is an area of continued research for us, and when the opportunity arises and the technology for doing this matures, we will definitely implement it in ProtonMail.
Roger Ison-Haug
supported this idea
·
-
134 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Roger Ison-Haug
supported this idea
·
-
1,332 votes
Roger Ison-Haug
supported this idea
·
This is a basic feature, please just get in in the roadmap