nucleartell
My feedback
10 results found
-
234 votes
As of March 2024, this feature is available on the web. Coming soon to other apps.
An error occurred while saving the comment An error occurred while saving the comment nucleartell
commented
@Josh I noted that you wrote "...but I am grateful they finally resolved this massive gaff for recurring events that Proton users invite others to".
I have not seen any updates regarding this anywhere (where do you even find the release notes these days?) so I did some tests.
Compared to my last comment from 1/4, you can now both edit and delete recurring events that have attendees, but you still never get the option for "this event and future events".
The iOS app is still lagging behind as you can't edit recurring events with attendees there and if you try to delete the event instead, you'll get a prompt asking if you want to remove the entire series.
Since there are no separate UserVoice sites for Calendar on web/PC/iOS etc, I'd consider this request to apply to all platforms. Hence this should not be marked as completed until we have feature parity between the platforms.
It also should not be marked as completed until we have the option for "this event and future events" for events with attendees as well. I mean, say you have a weekly recurring meeting with no end date set and you want to edit or delete that meeting after some time. Right now the only option is to edit or delete one instance at a time or delete the entire series...
I also tested external invites. Proton Mail says that the ICS file is invalid for some reason, so I can't perform any actions on the invite email in Proton Mail. Still, the event shows up in Proton Calendar and I can choose how to reply from there. But the issue remains that whatever you do with that event, it will apply to all of the events in the series.
So neither this request or the other that @Josh found is really completed.
An error occurred while saving the comment nucleartell
commented
Josh is correct, it isn't really working when there are attendees involved. If you try to edit, it will change the entire series.
You can at least delete single instances, even for events with attendees, but you never get the option for "this event and future events".
Until this is fixed, the support article should be updated to reflect the current state. But this needs to be pushed up the priority list as it's a crucial feature. The fact that this issue only occurs when there are attendees should've been caught before the feature was released.
nucleartell
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment nucleartell
commented
This should already be possible according to the support article linked below and based on my own testing just now.
-
1,676 votesnucleartell
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment nucleartell
commented
Microsoft, Google and Apple have separate apps for tasks/to-do lists and I feel like this is the way to go for Proton as well. Add yet another app to the portfolio - Proton Tasks, Proton To-Do, Proton Reminders or something along that line.
-
2,715 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment nucleartell
commented
Proton’s closest competitor Tuta has now added this feature to their service. Maybe that’ll get things moving at Proton as they often are neck and neck when it comes to features.
https://tuta.com/blog/full-device-contact-integration-is-here
For those in the comments that don’t want this feature. Why are you worried that this will be enabled by default or mandatory? Proton and Tuta has (basically) the same view on privacy, so I expect that the feature will be opt-in in Proton, just as it is in Tuta.
nucleartell
supported this idea
·
-
9 votesnucleartell
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment nucleartell
commented
I think this could be divided into two separate suggestions; "Add Rich Text Editor to event description" and "Remove character limit in event description".
Sure, it would be great to just increase the limit, but as I haven't encountered any other service that has a character limit I think it should simply be removed completely. There's already another suggestion for just that - https://protonmail.uservoice.com/forums/932842-proton-calendar/suggestions/43604232-no-character-limitation-for-calendar-events.
-
15 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment nucleartell
commented
Proton’s closest competitor Tutanota has now added support for unlimited subfolders as part of preparation for their migration feature.
https://github.com/tutao/tutanota/issues/4829
Proton and Tutanota usually are neck to neck when it comes to implementing certain features. Hopefully this triggers Proton to move this up in their prioritization.
An error occurred while saving the comment nucleartell
commented
I'll add some votes to this and link to their support page for more details. I'll also add that I don't see why there should be a limit at all. I don't know of any other email provider that imposes a limit to the levels of folder hierarchy, except for Tutanota which does not yet support subfolders at all. And if you compare it to folders in Windows, there's no nesting limit for the folders as long as the the length of the path doesn't exceed 260 characters.
https://protonmail.com/support/knowledge-base/easy-switch/#customize-other
I've also sent a support request regarding this and got the following reply.
"Please note that ProtonMail supports only up to 3 levels of folder nesting and this cannot be changed at the moment.
However, we will provide your feedback to the appropriate team for further consideration to see if this can be changed in the future."I suspect that the limitation has something to do with the encryption tech being used, but at the same time there are many encryption methods you can use which don't have this limitation, so that might not be the reason.
nucleartell
supported this idea
·
-
934 votesnucleartell
supported this idea
·
-
1,643 votesnucleartell
supported this idea
·
-
1,901 votes
We have given this quite a bit of thought, but at the present moment, it is not clear the advantages would outweigh the disadvantages.
The biggest problem is search. Encrypting all metadata would break metadata search entirely on the web client as there is still no efficient way to handle search of encrypted data within a browser.
Secondly, metadata encryption’s value from a privacy standpoint is also somewhat dubious. Because we ultimately must deliver the message to the recipient, we must know who the recipient is. At the current time, there still isn’t any proven and viable way to work around this.
Metadata encryption is an area of continued research for us, and when the opportunity arises and the technology for doing this matures, we will definitely implement it in ProtonMail.
An error occurred while saving the comment nucleartell
commented
@Snape
You probably logged in to the old client (https://app.tutanota.com/#login) which I think is still used as the default.
The new client (https://mail.tutanota.com/login) is the one that has support for search.
An error occurred while saving the comment nucleartell
commented
@SinCabeza Tutanota does have search: https://tutanota.com/blog/posts/first-search-encrypted-data
nucleartell
supported this idea
·
-
2,621 votesnucleartell
supported this idea
·
-
403 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment nucleartell
commented
Right now this seems to be the one regarding this with the most votes and also marked as planned: https://protonmail.uservoice.com/forums/284483-feedback/suggestions/7849656-labels-are-great-but . I suggest everyone move their votes to that one instead.
An error occurred while saving the comment nucleartell
commented
Folders are now available: https://protonmail.uservoice.com/forums/284483-feedback/suggestions/16535209-being-able-to-create-custom-folders. Regarding sub-folders: right now this seems to be the one with the most votes and also marked as planned: https://protonmail.uservoice.com/forums/284483-feedback/suggestions/7849656-labels-are-great-but . I suggest everyone move their votes to that one instead.
An error occurred while saving the comment nucleartell
commented
Folders are now available: https://protonmail.uservoice.com/forums/284483-feedback/suggestions/16535209-being-able-to-create-custom-folders. Regarding sub-folders: right now this seems to be the one with the most votes and also marked as planned: https://protonmail.uservoice.com/forums/284483-feedback/suggestions/7849656-labels-are-great-but . I suggest everyone move their votes to that one instead.
An error occurred while saving the comment nucleartell
commented
Right now this seems to be the one regarding this with the most votes and also marked as planned: https://protonmail.uservoice.com/forums/284483-feedback/suggestions/7849656-labels-are-great-but . I suggest everyone move their votes to that one instead.
An error occurred while saving the comment nucleartell
commented
As Mick Bert mentioned below. Right now this seems to be the one regarding this with the most votes and also marked as planned: https://protonmail.uservoice.com/forums/284483-feedback/suggestions/7849656-labels-are-great-but . I suggest everyone move their votes to that one instead.
An error occurred while saving the comment nucleartell
commented
Right now this seems to be the one regarding this with the most votes and also marked as planned: https://protonmail.uservoice.com/forums/284483-feedback/suggestions/7849656-labels-are-great-but . I suggest everyone move their votes to that one instead.
nucleartell
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment nucleartell
commented
As Mich Bert mentioned below. Right now this seems to be the one regarding this with the most votes and also marked as planned: https://protonmail.uservoice.com/forums/284483-feedback/suggestions/7849656-labels-are-great-but . I suggest everyone move their votes to that one instead.
An error occurred while saving the comment nucleartell
commented
Protonmail seems to have their mind quite made up about this feature according to this suggestion: http://alturl.com/qftzn where they refer to this kb: http://alturl.com/ef6yf. But just in case they might change their mind about it, I suggest everyone move their vote to the suggestion with the most votes (and that hasn't been marked as "Complete") which seems to be this one: http://alturl.com/t8ef4
Considering they've marked this request as started, with a comment saying that it's available on the web - even though it is not fully in place on any platform, not even the web - it feels like this request is on it's way to also be erroneously marked as complete, just as the related request linked below.
https://protonmail.uservoice.com/forums/284483-proton-mail/suggestions/43856670-delete-individual-entries-from-shared-recurring-ev
Because of this, I put together a list about what works and not regarding this feature. I sent that list to Proton along with feedback regarding their lack of feedback here on UserVoice.
Hopefully it will get some attention, but I'm hesitant as some of these issues are so blatantly obvious that I'm sometimes wondering if Proton is even using their own service.