Tutanota.com has this feature, where people can type a address and decide what to do with it.
a current easy fix for this is just send the e-mail you want blocked to spam, that is what I do. A better fix would be to have a way to just delete e-mail you don't want, meaning directly get rid or meaning just delete and by pass the trash. Proton could do this by add a future in the filters, to where people can move to delete instead of spam.
that would be nice, great idea,
I had a hard time E-mail some people, that I really need to, It makes me wonder if some E-mail Clients, have this feature, included already!
Tutanota another e-mail provider has this option already, they set it up to where people can input the e-mail and decide where that e-mail address always goes, and people don't have to deal with them.
great I idea.
their is many ways they can improve Protonmail, but the question is how...
I wonder if a auto trash delete would fix this issue, Tutanota E-mail has tried to get this feature, I don't think it would take much programing to do this all. Proton would have to do is pick a day that every month has, and delete it on that certain day.
1 votepnobulls shared this idea ·
interesting idea, but like Stian said that is all I would want it to do my self. how ever I am unsure how many people would even want that, because of all the Security issues.
Yes, it would be great to have a better browser, Brave feels sites, and People should get paid for content, (ad rev) I understand why.. I have never been happy with any Browser, Epic is ok, but they must improve features. I have tested many browsers I don't like them, and they all have pros and cons. I could go into more in depth of why I don't like them and why they are just ok.
Brave is Based by Chromium which was Googles Main source code. Yes it might be open source, but that is where the code came from.
I love the idea because of how the current browsers stuck and lack lots of security features, I have had issues with all of them, They all lack Privacy things, and that is why it is needed. yes, some are better than others. because of how Chrome and Firefox are open source, some what it would not be that hard, to build one, after they got started, they would have to add more privacy things. Yes I have tried Chrome, Epic, Brave, Firefox and many others and in my thoughts they all suck when it comes to privacy.
Water Fox is a older version of Fire fox with Mozilla back door out.
I use epic they claim they are the best, but I have found not. I have tested my browsers so I know many great ideas that could be imputed to make a better browser, if I had the Programming skills many things would be different in the Computer world, it would make the net better and more secure for all.
Esther Use Startpage, you get google results. and it is very secure, some times I feel it is more secure than duckduckgo.
Amen! their is many browswers out their and I have not been impress, I wished they would build one, if they do I have many ideas to imput things to make it safe and secure and clean of crap.
anti virus is designed to fail and will be that way until they are forced to changed.
gee, wiz I am unsure what to think, I love the idea, but here is something better, use HerdProtect, they use over 60 Engines, which would be nice, if they bought that and kept it going, yes their needs to be better antivirus scanners they suck. in my thought I could make a better one that is better out here, just by adding certain features.
that you rock if they did that, I am quite surprised it is not done, Proton is high on security, why not add this so it make things even tighter. I would also be nice if people could add addresses so they by pass and are auto deleted. Tutanota Already does it for spam why not do it for all spam and trash.
I love the feature, but you are right it save too much, It would be nice to let people choose how often it saves. In Microsoft word saves every 15 minutes and people can change the default. I would be happy if it was set up to let people decide how often.
1,605 votesunder review · 21 comments · Feedback » Features seen on other services · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
might be intresting but what if we don't want to use the feature, so how are we going to turn it off if we don't want it?
it would cool, but the main issues are size for users and secure, that is 2 that I know about their is could more, the main thought is it worth investing.
their is many vpn tool out their, it would be cool if they supported them, but the many question is how secure are they.
would be nice, but you can't do it too much because of the speed of devices. Some do 50 and others do more, if it was me I won't not use over 50 due to the speed of devices.
Bcc: also known as blind Carbon Copy Does this by only showing who send the message. this is standard in all e-mails, this might answer what you are thinking of. I have a issue similar to yours, and that was the answer for, me, if doing this does not work, then yes it is a huge issue and needs to be fixed asp.
People can do this by using Pgp or gpg4win, and create own keys, I don't understand why it is not imputted now!
mark all e-mails as spam, and let filter decide what is and what is not.
Yahoo, does it after year, unless a person check their mail at least once. I don't care what is done, but a fair policy needs to be inputed, and it needs to be least longer, for many reasons.
if I was you I would report this as a possible security issue to proton and make the Developers totally aware of this. I am not sure if it is one, I would e-mail and ask and tell them the details and let them decide what to do, I am unsure if you will get help here. good luck with your issue.
that would be cool, when e-mailing people I must always ask because of this issue and needs to be done, if it was done others most likely would fellow.