Rom.
My feedback
13 results found
-
699 votes
Rom. supported this idea ·
-
738 votes
Rom. supported this idea ·
-
786 votes
Rom. supported this idea ·
-
219 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Rom. supported this idea ·
-
144 votes
Rom. supported this idea ·
-
311 votes
Rom. supported this idea ·
-
733 votes
Rom. supported this idea ·
-
203 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Rom. commented
How's "unlimited" ... restricted ?
Really disappointed lately by your whole service ... VPN has issues, we are denied from functionality that other plans have ... it's really getting "meh".Rom. supported this idea ·
-
648 votes
Rom. supported this idea ·
-
2,149 votes
We have given this quite a bit of thought, but at the present moment, it is not clear the advantages would outweigh the disadvantages.
The biggest problem is search. Encrypting all metadata would break metadata search entirely on the web client as there is still no efficient way to handle search of encrypted data within a browser.
Secondly, metadata encryption’s value from a privacy standpoint is also somewhat dubious. Because we ultimately must deliver the message to the recipient, we must know who the recipient is. At the current time, there still isn’t any proven and viable way to work around this.
Metadata encryption is an area of continued research for us, and when the opportunity arises and the technology for doing this matures, we will definitely implement it in ProtonMail.
An error occurred while saving the comment Rom. commented
I though I've read somewhere that you couldn't do the "automatic forward email" because you couldn't see any informations about the emails ?!
And here it looks like you need this for search ? Am I missing something here ?
-
6,780 votes
Rom. supported this idea ·
-
2,787 votes
Rom. supported this idea ·
-
192 votes
Rom. supported this idea ·
This is critical.
I don't need 'Duo' but I feel like you don't honor your promise to make Proton "unlimited" really unlimited.
That's a shame.