Adrian Bjugård
My feedback
20 results found
-
143 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
60 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
26 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
3 votes
Adrian Bjugård
shared this idea
·
-
83 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
98 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
539 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
291 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
111 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
195 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
417 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
1,278 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
717 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
1,585 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
2,881 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
2,104 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
306 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
569 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
606 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
2,051 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
+Alias is not enough. I get limits on Proton owned domains, that makes sense, but limiting the number of aliases used on my own domains should not be a thing.
I get that there may be technical difficulties with this, regarding encryption. I think the obvious solution is to generate a "catch-all" key that can be used for these addresses that haven't been given an "address" slot (because they aren't used much).