Adrian Bjugård
My feedback
20 results found
-
149 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
70 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
36 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
3 votes
Adrian Bjugård
shared this idea
·
-
83 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
105 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
554 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
296 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
114 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
205 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
435 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
1,498 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
772 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
1,668 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
2,969 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
2,265 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
314 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
590 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
611 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
2,133 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
+Alias is not enough. I get limits on Proton owned domains, that makes sense, but limiting the number of aliases used on my own domains should not be a thing.
I get that there may be technical difficulties with this, regarding encryption. I think the obvious solution is to generate a "catch-all" key that can be used for these addresses that haven't been given an "address" slot (because they aren't used much).