Adrian Bjugård
My feedback
20 results found
-
144 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
65 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
26 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
3 votes
Adrian Bjugård
shared this idea
·
-
83 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
99 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
542 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
293 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
113 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
195 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
421 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
1,335 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
727 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
1,602 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
2,899 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
2,124 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
308 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
574 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
608 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
2,065 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
+Alias is not enough. I get limits on Proton owned domains, that makes sense, but limiting the number of aliases used on my own domains should not be a thing.
I get that there may be technical difficulties with this, regarding encryption. I think the obvious solution is to generate a "catch-all" key that can be used for these addresses that haven't been given an "address" slot (because they aren't used much).