Adrian Bjugård
My feedback
20 results found
-
147 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
68 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
33 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
3 votes
Adrian Bjugård
shared this idea
·
-
83 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
103 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
552 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
295 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
114 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
202 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
435 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
1,471 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
763 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
1,658 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
2,961 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
2,254 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
313 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
586 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
609 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
2,124 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
+Alias is not enough. I get limits on Proton owned domains, that makes sense, but limiting the number of aliases used on my own domains should not be a thing.
I get that there may be technical difficulties with this, regarding encryption. I think the obvious solution is to generate a "catch-all" key that can be used for these addresses that haven't been given an "address" slot (because they aren't used much).