Adrian Bjugård
My feedback
20 results found
-
142 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
58 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
22 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
3 votes
Adrian Bjugård
shared this idea
·
-
83 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
96 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
536 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
288 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
111 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
196 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
412 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
1,224 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
707 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
1,567 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
2,864 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
2,068 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
305 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
563 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
604 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
2,032 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
+Alias is not enough. I get limits on Proton owned domains, that makes sense, but limiting the number of aliases used on my own domains should not be a thing.
I get that there may be technical difficulties with this, regarding encryption. I think the obvious solution is to generate a "catch-all" key that can be used for these addresses that haven't been given an "address" slot (because they aren't used much).