Adrian Bjugård
My feedback
20 results found
-
144 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
68 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
31 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
3 votes
Adrian Bjugård
shared this idea
·
-
84 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
101 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
547 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
296 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
114 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
200 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
432 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
1,417 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
744 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
1,633 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
2,941 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
2,215 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
311 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
580 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
610 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
2,102 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
+Alias is not enough. I get limits on Proton owned domains, that makes sense, but limiting the number of aliases used on my own domains should not be a thing.
I get that there may be technical difficulties with this, regarding encryption. I think the obvious solution is to generate a "catch-all" key that can be used for these addresses that haven't been given an "address" slot (because they aren't used much).