Adrian Bjugård
My feedback
20 results found
-
145 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
67 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
29 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
3 votes
Adrian Bjugård
shared this idea
·
-
83 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
101 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
545 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
293 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
113 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
197 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
426 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
1,374 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
738 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
1,617 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
2,918 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
2,158 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
309 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
577 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
608 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
-
2,074 votes
Adrian Bjugård
supported this idea
·
+Alias is not enough. I get limits on Proton owned domains, that makes sense, but limiting the number of aliases used on my own domains should not be a thing.
I get that there may be technical difficulties with this, regarding encryption. I think the obvious solution is to generate a "catch-all" key that can be used for these addresses that haven't been given an "address" slot (because they aren't used much).