Overuse
My feedback
48 results found
-
1,565 votesOveruse
supported this idea
·
-
467 votesOveruse
supported this idea
·
-
43 votesOveruse
supported this idea
·
-
612 votesOveruse
supported this idea
·
-
51 votesOveruse
supported this idea
·
-
345 votesOveruse
supported this idea
·
-
68 votesOveruse
supported this idea
·
-
1,060 votesOveruse
supported this idea
·
-
1,080 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Overuse
supported this idea
·
-
66 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Overuse
commented
It's also mirrored by GrapheneOS, arguably the most private and secure android/mobile OS, and was repeatedly recommended by them:
https://grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS/112821386750410102
https://x.com/GrapheneOS/status/1782858595987526134
https://x.com/GrapheneOS/status/1810306797426602002
https://x.com/GrapheneOS/status/1810318146399601009Overuse
supported this idea
·
Overuse
shared this idea
·
-
39 votesOveruse
supported this idea
·
-
979 votesOveruse
supported this idea
·
-
3,865 votesOveruse
supported this idea
·
-
2,871 votes
Proton and Standard Notes are joining forces: https://proton.me/blog/proton-standard-notes-join-forces
Overuse
supported this idea
·
-
1,871 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Overuse
commented
I don't think this is a privacy risk because there is no sensitive data transferred, but at least give everyone a choice.
Make one version without Google's notification service and one with it for people who have less battery capacity.
Privacy is about being able to have a choice, and if I want a de-googled phone and still get all the notification, than Proton shouldn't be in the way of it.
(At least Proton is not dependent on google play services to work, just for notifications, which is still awesome IMHO and seems to be often forgotten here)
Edit: e.g. Proton Calendar has no notification problems at all without google play services, at least in my experienceOveruse
supported this idea
·
-
374 votesOveruse
supported this idea
·
-
379 votesOveruse
supported this idea
·
-
395 votesOveruse
supported this idea
·
-
396 votesOveruse
supported this idea
·
-
596 votesOveruse
supported this idea
·
I think this might put some users at ease when you sync with your devices. Even if you have your folders synced to e.g. your phone, someone with access to the unlocked device can't open certain very private folders without an extra password. Currently I use verycrypt and picocrypt for that, so IDK how important this feature really is, but might be good to have.