Overuse
My feedback
48 results found
-
1,593 votesOveruse
supported this idea
·
-
474 votesOveruse
supported this idea
·
-
43 votesOveruse
supported this idea
·
-
629 votesOveruse
supported this idea
·
-
54 votesOveruse
supported this idea
·
-
363 votesOveruse
supported this idea
·
-
70 votesOveruse
supported this idea
·
-
1,094 votesOveruse
supported this idea
·
-
1,099 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Overuse
supported this idea
·
-
66 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Overuse
commented
It's also mirrored by GrapheneOS, arguably the most private and secure android/mobile OS, and was repeatedly recommended by them:
https://grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS/112821386750410102
https://x.com/GrapheneOS/status/1782858595987526134
https://x.com/GrapheneOS/status/1810306797426602002
https://x.com/GrapheneOS/status/1810318146399601009Overuse
supported this idea
·
Overuse
shared this idea
·
-
42 votesOveruse
supported this idea
·
-
991 votesOveruse
supported this idea
·
-
3,927 votesOveruse
supported this idea
·
-
2,909 votes
Proton and Standard Notes are joining forces: https://proton.me/blog/proton-standard-notes-join-forces
Overuse
supported this idea
·
-
1,893 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Overuse
commented
I don't think this is a privacy risk because there is no sensitive data transferred, but at least give everyone a choice.
Make one version without Google's notification service and one with it for people who have less battery capacity.
Privacy is about being able to have a choice, and if I want a de-googled phone and still get all the notification, than Proton shouldn't be in the way of it.
(At least Proton is not dependent on google play services to work, just for notifications, which is still awesome IMHO and seems to be often forgotten here)
Edit: e.g. Proton Calendar has no notification problems at all without google play services, at least in my experienceOveruse
supported this idea
·
-
377 votesOveruse
supported this idea
·
-
382 votesOveruse
supported this idea
·
-
397 votesOveruse
supported this idea
·
-
403 votesOveruse
supported this idea
·
-
605 votesOveruse
supported this idea
·
I think this might put some users at ease when you sync with your devices. Even if you have your folders synced to e.g. your phone, someone with access to the unlocked device can't open certain very private folders without an extra password. Currently I use verycrypt and picocrypt for that, so IDK how important this feature really is, but might be good to have.