Tom
My feedback
16 results found
-
103 votes
Tom supported this idea ·
-
115 votes
Tom supported this idea ·
-
457 votes
Tom supported this idea ·
-
312 votes
Tom supported this idea ·
-
109 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Tom supported this idea ·
-
2,726 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Tom commented
As much as I like the idea, I’ll settle for it being in standard notes when it’s finally integrated
Tom supported this idea ·
-
622 votes
Tom supported this idea ·
-
124 votes
Tom supported this idea ·
-
268 votes
Tom supported this idea ·
-
1,339 votes
Tom supported this idea ·
-
2,349 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Tom commented
I don’t know how this can be done in a security conscious way. Proton drive doesn’t know what proton mail has and vice versa.
-
1,019 votes
Tom supported this idea ·
-
2,330 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Tom commented
No thank you. Host a server for another app. Simplex?
-
552 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Tom commented
Dedicated IPs seem to be against proton's mission statement. I understand how useful they are for regular use but I vote no against dedicated IPs for now. Lets get other problems fixed up.
Dedicated IPs are the illusion of privacy, especially when the government has automatic subpoenas for a copy of their metadata.
-
823 votes
Tom supported this idea ·
-
443 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Tom commented
Per https://mullvad.net/en/blog/stable-quantum-resistant-tunnels-in-the-app it would seem that quantum resistant VPN tunnels can be created and deployed. This was back in April 2003, has there been any news/status of proton doing this?
Tom supported this idea ·
lol, this one is common sense if the username can’t be reassigned.
Unless there is a server cost for inactive accounts?