Tom
My feedback
16 results found
-
125 votes
Tom
supported this idea
·
-
149 votes
Tom
supported this idea
·
-
2,888 votes
Tom
supported this idea
·
-
438 votes
Tom
supported this idea
·
-
124 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Tom
supported this idea
·
-
3,450 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Tom
commented
As much as I like the idea, I’ll settle for it being in standard notes when it’s finally integrated
Tom
supported this idea
·
-
921 votes
Tom
supported this idea
·
-
144 votes
Tom
supported this idea
·
-
327 votes
Tom
supported this idea
·
-
1,904 votes
Tom
supported this idea
·
-
2,828 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Tom
commented
I don’t know how this can be done in a security conscious way. Proton drive doesn’t know what proton mail has and vice versa.
-
1,281 votes
Tom
supported this idea
·
-
2,716 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Tom
commented
No thank you. Host a server for another app. Simplex?
-
709 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Tom
commented
Dedicated IPs seem to be against proton's mission statement. I understand how useful they are for regular use but I vote no against dedicated IPs for now. Lets get other problems fixed up.
Dedicated IPs are the illusion of privacy, especially when the government has automatic subpoenas for a copy of their metadata.
-
1,072 votes
Currently all three of these systems have feature parity; the gap is in terms of UI, and this is something that we have in our plans to close.
Tom
supported this idea
·
-
606 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Tom
commented
Per https://mullvad.net/en/blog/stable-quantum-resistant-tunnels-in-the-app it would seem that quantum resistant VPN tunnels can be created and deployed. This was back in April 2003, has there been any news/status of proton doing this?
Tom
supported this idea
·
lol, this one is common sense if the username can’t be reassigned.
Unless there is a server cost for inactive accounts?