Tom
My feedback
16 results found
-
121 votes
Tom
supported this idea
·
-
140 votes
Tom
supported this idea
·
-
742 votes
Tom
supported this idea
·
-
412 votes
Tom
supported this idea
·
-
122 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Tom
supported this idea
·
-
3,323 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Tom
commented
As much as I like the idea, I’ll settle for it being in standard notes when it’s finally integrated
Tom
supported this idea
·
-
897 votes
Tom
supported this idea
·
-
143 votes
Tom
supported this idea
·
-
320 votes
Tom
supported this idea
·
-
1,824 votes
Tom
supported this idea
·
-
2,763 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Tom
commented
I don’t know how this can be done in a security conscious way. Proton drive doesn’t know what proton mail has and vice versa.
-
1,253 votes
Tom
supported this idea
·
-
2,649 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Tom
commented
No thank you. Host a server for another app. Simplex?
-
689 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Tom
commented
Dedicated IPs seem to be against proton's mission statement. I understand how useful they are for regular use but I vote no against dedicated IPs for now. Lets get other problems fixed up.
Dedicated IPs are the illusion of privacy, especially when the government has automatic subpoenas for a copy of their metadata.
-
1,042 votes
Currently all three of these systems have feature parity; the gap is in terms of UI, and this is something that we have in our plans to close.
Tom
supported this idea
·
-
584 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Tom
commented
Per https://mullvad.net/en/blog/stable-quantum-resistant-tunnels-in-the-app it would seem that quantum resistant VPN tunnels can be created and deployed. This was back in April 2003, has there been any news/status of proton doing this?
Tom
supported this idea
·
lol, this one is common sense if the username can’t be reassigned.
Unless there is a server cost for inactive accounts?