Skip to content

Tib

My feedback

11 results found

  1. 85 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Tib supported this idea  · 
  2. 1,911 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We have given this quite a bit of thought, but at the present moment, it is not clear the advantages would outweigh the disadvantages.

    The biggest problem is search. Encrypting all metadata would break metadata search entirely on the web client as there is still no efficient way to handle search of encrypted data within a browser.

    Secondly, metadata encryption’s value from a privacy standpoint is also somewhat dubious. Because we ultimately must deliver the message to the recipient, we must know who the recipient is. At the current time, there still isn’t any proven and viable way to work around this.

    Metadata encryption is an area of continued research for us, and when the opportunity arises and the technology for doing this matures, we will definitely implement it in ProtonMail.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Tib commented  · 

    Tutanota has this aswell, if it still causes issue with the search, it would be nice if you give us the choice to encrypt meta data. Especially the email subject & attachement names.

    Tib supported this idea  · 
  3. 771 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Tib supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Tib commented  · 

    Just recently storage was increased for the free account.

    Others offer:
    Dropdbox: 2TB for €9.99
    Microsoft 365 Personal: 1TB for ~€5.5
    Sync.com: 2TB for €8
    ICloud: 2TB for €11.20

    Please increase storage as a baseline from 500GB to 1TB per User. most people won't use it anyways and for those who do, it has an big impact. + It looks better on paper. 500GB sounds for most people to low and not future proof, even though they don't require that amount.

  4. 105 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Tib supported this idea  · 
  5. 311 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Tib supported this idea  · 
  6. 662 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Tib commented  · 

    This is a anti privacy feature and goes against what Proton stands for.

  7. 634 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Tib supported this idea  · 
  8. 822 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Tib supported this idea  · 
  9. 423 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Tib commented  · 

    I would also say this is a must have. For devs there could also be an option to just obey .gitignore.

    Tib supported this idea  · 
  10. 4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Tib shared this idea  · 
  11. 4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Tib commented  · 

    This is needed because buying separate subscriptions for different accounts is much more expensive than unlimited and some might make that decision after the already started using a service.

    Tib shared this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base