Anonymous
My feedback
90 results found
-
1,138 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
585 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
541 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
690 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
2,849 votes
Proton and Standard Notes are joining forces: https://proton.me/blog/proton-standard-notes-join-forces
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
452 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
1,088 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
161 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
215 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
36 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
7 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
93 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
6 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
6 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
206 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
508 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
777 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
1,042 votes
Currently all three of these systems have feature parity; the gap is in terms of UI, and this is something that we have in our plans to close.
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
466 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
129 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment
Anonymous
commented
Here are some additional recommendations for improvements to search:
In "More search options":
- Add a "Email Subject" filter field that uses freeform text
- Add a "Email Body" or "Email Content" filter field that uses freeform text
- Add a "Has attachment" filter field that uses boolean operators
- Add a "Attachment Type" filter field that uses either drop down with predetermined options or freeform text
On the desktop app, when expanding search using the "More search options"
It only exposes From (date), To (date), Sender, and Recipient, search fields.
These are a good start but need Subject and Body fields search options (even if downloading messages locally is required) to really be fully featured.