Jannis
My feedback
44 results found
-
183 votes
Jannis
supported this idea
·
-
327 votes
Jannis
supported this idea
·
-
131 votes
Jannis
supported this idea
·
-
288 votes
Jannis
supported this idea
·
-
349 votes
Jannis
supported this idea
·
-
275 votes
Jannis
supported this idea
·
-
149 votes
Jannis
supported this idea
·
-
23 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Jannis
supported this idea
·
-
666 votes
Jannis
supported this idea
·
-
715 votes
Jannis
supported this idea
·
-
612 votes
Jannis
supported this idea
·
-
970 votes
Jannis
supported this idea
·
-
1,517 votes
Jannis
supported this idea
·
-
1,549 votes
Jannis
supported this idea
·
-
1,641 votes
Jannis
supported this idea
·
-
1,743 votes
Jannis
supported this idea
·
-
42 votes
Jannis
supported this idea
·
-
2 votes
Jannis
shared this idea
·
-
2,087 votes
We have given this quite a bit of thought, but at the present moment, it is not clear the advantages would outweigh the disadvantages.
The biggest problem is search. Encrypting all metadata would break metadata search entirely on the web client as there is still no efficient way to handle search of encrypted data within a browser.
Secondly, metadata encryption’s value from a privacy standpoint is also somewhat dubious. Because we ultimately must deliver the message to the recipient, we must know who the recipient is. At the current time, there still isn’t any proven and viable way to work around this.
Metadata encryption is an area of continued research for us, and when the opportunity arises and the technology for doing this matures, we will definitely implement it in ProtonMail.
Jannis
supported this idea
·
-
3,529 votes
Jannis
supported this idea
·
I imagine how much time it would save me ... Love the idea