Jannis
My feedback
44 results found
-
198 votes
Jannis
supported this idea
·
-
351 votes
Jannis
supported this idea
·
-
220 votes
Jannis
supported this idea
·
-
314 votes
Jannis
supported this idea
·
-
385 votes
Jannis
supported this idea
·
-
370 votes
Jannis
supported this idea
·
-
219 votes
Jannis
supported this idea
·
-
30 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Jannis
supported this idea
·
-
721 votes
Jannis
supported this idea
·
-
787 votes
Jannis
supported this idea
·
-
654 votes
Jannis
supported this idea
·
-
1,004 votes
Jannis
supported this idea
·
-
1,623 votes
Jannis
supported this idea
·
-
1,688 votes
Jannis
supported this idea
·
-
1,751 votes
Jannis
supported this idea
·
-
1,881 votes
Jannis
supported this idea
·
-
46 votes
Jannis
supported this idea
·
-
5 votes
Jannis
shared this idea
·
-
2,124 votes
We have given this quite a bit of thought, but at the present moment, it is not clear the advantages would outweigh the disadvantages.
The biggest problem is search. Encrypting all metadata would break metadata search entirely on the web client as there is still no efficient way to handle search of encrypted data within a browser.
Secondly, metadata encryption’s value from a privacy standpoint is also somewhat dubious. Because we ultimately must deliver the message to the recipient, we must know who the recipient is. At the current time, there still isn’t any proven and viable way to work around this.
Metadata encryption is an area of continued research for us, and when the opportunity arises and the technology for doing this matures, we will definitely implement it in ProtonMail.
Jannis
supported this idea
·
-
3,748 votes
Jannis
supported this idea
·
I imagine how much time it would save me ... Love the idea