Jannis
My feedback
44 results found
-
196 votes
Jannis
supported this idea
·
-
345 votes
Jannis
supported this idea
·
-
205 votes
Jannis
supported this idea
·
-
312 votes
Jannis
supported this idea
·
-
376 votes
Jannis
supported this idea
·
-
345 votes
Jannis
supported this idea
·
-
202 votes
Jannis
supported this idea
·
-
27 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Jannis
supported this idea
·
-
702 votes
Jannis
supported this idea
·
-
764 votes
Jannis
supported this idea
·
-
637 votes
Jannis
supported this idea
·
-
994 votes
Jannis
supported this idea
·
-
1,588 votes
Jannis
supported this idea
·
-
1,636 votes
Jannis
supported this idea
·
-
1,718 votes
Jannis
supported this idea
·
-
1,852 votes
Jannis
supported this idea
·
-
45 votes
Jannis
supported this idea
·
-
5 votes
Jannis
shared this idea
·
-
2,120 votes
We have given this quite a bit of thought, but at the present moment, it is not clear the advantages would outweigh the disadvantages.
The biggest problem is search. Encrypting all metadata would break metadata search entirely on the web client as there is still no efficient way to handle search of encrypted data within a browser.
Secondly, metadata encryption’s value from a privacy standpoint is also somewhat dubious. Because we ultimately must deliver the message to the recipient, we must know who the recipient is. At the current time, there still isn’t any proven and viable way to work around this.
Metadata encryption is an area of continued research for us, and when the opportunity arises and the technology for doing this matures, we will definitely implement it in ProtonMail.
Jannis
supported this idea
·
-
3,703 votes
Jannis
supported this idea
·
I imagine how much time it would save me ... Love the idea