Anonymous
My feedback
22 results found
-
259 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
4 votes
Anonymous
shared this idea
·
-
972 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
1,689 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
2,046 votes
Proton and Standard Notes are joining forces: https://proton.me/blog/proton-standard-notes-join-forces
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
2,545 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
215 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
244 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
347 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
402 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
431 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
501 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
640 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
693 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
665 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
699 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
2,031 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
2,097 votes
We have given this quite a bit of thought, but at the present moment, it is not clear the advantages would outweigh the disadvantages.
The biggest problem is search. Encrypting all metadata would break metadata search entirely on the web client as there is still no efficient way to handle search of encrypted data within a browser.
Secondly, metadata encryption’s value from a privacy standpoint is also somewhat dubious. Because we ultimately must deliver the message to the recipient, we must know who the recipient is. At the current time, there still isn’t any proven and viable way to work around this.
Metadata encryption is an area of continued research for us, and when the opportunity arises and the technology for doing this matures, we will definitely implement it in ProtonMail.
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
3,078 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
6,706 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
Would be awesome to manage them in the same window as Proton mail... just like Gmail does it....
I miss iGoogle, peak efficiency days. :)