Anonymous
My feedback
22 results found
-
170 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
4 votes
Anonymous
shared this idea
·
-
890 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
1,621 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
2,001 votes
Proton and Standard Notes are joining forces: https://proton.me/blog/proton-standard-notes-join-forces
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
2,491 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
208 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
235 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
346 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
398 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
423 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
480 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
629 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
672 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
660 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
687 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
2,019 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
2,072 votes
We have given this quite a bit of thought, but at the present moment, it is not clear the advantages would outweigh the disadvantages.
The biggest problem is search. Encrypting all metadata would break metadata search entirely on the web client as there is still no efficient way to handle search of encrypted data within a browser.
Secondly, metadata encryption’s value from a privacy standpoint is also somewhat dubious. Because we ultimately must deliver the message to the recipient, we must know who the recipient is. At the current time, there still isn’t any proven and viable way to work around this.
Metadata encryption is an area of continued research for us, and when the opportunity arises and the technology for doing this matures, we will definitely implement it in ProtonMail.
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
3,009 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
6,681 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
Would be awesome to manage them in the same window as Proton mail... just like Gmail does it....
I miss iGoogle, peak efficiency days. :)