Sam
My feedback
29 results found
-
6 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Sam
supported this idea
·
-
602 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Sam
commented
Echoing a lot of what's already been said here. From a Business user perspective this feature seems like an absolute "must have".
From a purely business use case this is such a major flaw. If I (on MacOS) share a folder from the Business account to a member of my team, they would have to:
1. Login to the web Drive.
2. Download a file to their computer (taken out of Proton Drive's protective environment)
3. Edit the file.
4. Hopefully upload again to the shared folder (put back in Proton Drive's protective environment).
5. Delete the file from the local machine.Even if there are some assumptions made about how secure the user's environment is or isn't, this is just a terrible workflow. It almost ensures that a Business user will have random sensitive company files on their personal device outside of Proton Drive's environment. The likelihood that these files are all deleted is low.
This isn't even getting to the fact that I have a personal Proton Drive account as well, but don't have a method to sync both a Personal account and a Business account to the same device.
I agree with the sentiment here that Proton appears to be going wider when I feel like it needs to be going deeper. AI (Lumo) and the Bitcoin Wallet are cool, but I'd rather have more functionality in the core products. For instance, Tresorit has had this feature for a long time. Obviously Google has had this. So what's the incentive to use Proton Drive in current form instead of the competition? I say this as one of the earliest Proton paid users who really wants to see this become the absolutely easy recommendation. It's just hard to even show this to business people because they're going to look once and realize that Google Drive or Tresorit have the features they want and then continue to be so entrenched in those ecosystems they'll likely never look back.
Sam
supported this idea
·
-
242 votesSam
supported this idea
·
-
39 votesSam
supported this idea
·
-
3,009 votesSam
supported this idea
·
-
376 votesSam
supported this idea
·
-
311 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Sam
commented
I agree completely. Came to write this feature request and saw there was already one in place.
This would be incredibly helpful. As mentioned, many services require a name and at least ZIP code to sign up for the service, even when there’s no practical reason (from the user’s perspective) for this information.
I end up going to either:
https://www.fakepersongenerator.com/
https://www.fakenamegenerator.com/ (A Google service IIRC)This gives me what I want, but it’s an annoying extra step.
The point isn’t to be nefarious about it, but I don’t like giving my real information if I don’t see the clear reason for it.
I think Proton Pass offering this service would be a tremendous aid for those of us who already practice this form of privacy but would also make adoption of some additional privacy practices flourish along those who just find it too burdensome.
Sam
supported this idea
·
-
17 votesSam
supported this idea
·
-
354 votesSam
supported this idea
·
-
112 votesSam
supported this idea
·
-
1,141 votesSam
supported this idea
·
-
191 votesSam
supported this idea
·
-
182 votesSam
supported this idea
·
-
291 votesSam
supported this idea
·
-
1,057 votesSam
supported this idea
·
-
364 votesSam
supported this idea
·
-
5,017 votesSam
supported this idea
·
-
2,110 votesSam
supported this idea
·
-
930 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Sam
commented
I could almost see a Ghost Folder feature like Cryptee has.
Where you can Ghost (hide) a folder. It's then hidden and essentially unknown to anyone. However you can unGhost it by typing the exact folder name.
Sam
supported this idea
·
-
1,320 votesSam
supported this idea
·
I second this. My business chose Proton as our service provider for Mail, Drive, and Pass (because I've used Proton for around 10 years, and now I get to make the decisions). My partner has been using the Proton Mail Bridge and accessing through Outlook because he's blind. It's the mail client he's use to.
Today I was showing him around Proton Mail (which does generally work well with his accessibility software) but he mentioned that the Read Aloud in Outlook was extremely useful to him. Otherwise he would use the native Proton Mail app exclusively.
I know making software for the blind and visually impaired is not a high priority for most and this improvement request may not gain a lot of votes, but it would be extremely meaningful to the few who need this feature. Perhaps it could somehow be integrated with the Scribe feature?