P. Y.
My feedback
14 results found
-
377 votesP. Y.
supported this idea
·
-
1,056 votes
Currently all three of these systems have feature parity; the gap is in terms of UI, and this is something that we have in our plans to close.
P. Y.
supported this idea
·
-
749 votesP. Y.
supported this idea
·
-
1,851 votes
-
1,920 votes
As per the Spring/Summer Roadmap, this is being developed: https://proton.me/blog/pass-roadmap-spring-summer-2026
Folders will be a significant building block for Proton Pass that will go beyond just helping you organize your items. Introducing folders will require some rethinking of our cryptography model, which we’re currently working on. Eventually, you’ll also be able to share folders and subfolders just like your vaults and individual items, giving you another flexible way to share access.
Folders will be available in the coming months. As well as creating vaults, you’ll be able to create dedicated folders and subfolders to organize crucial information for quick retrieval: you can organize by project, by team, by year, or whatever else you need.
P. Y.
supported this idea
·
-
809 votesP. Y.
supported this idea
·
-
1,267 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment P. Y.
supported this idea
·
-
1,857 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment P. Y.
commented
I wonder if Proton Drive can be integrated into the desktop environtments like GNOME and KDE Plasma. Services like NextCloud and Google Drive already support this.
Proton VPN needs official Flatpak support. They should verify the community Flatpak at the very least.
If the rest of the suite won't have dedicated apps, it's better to install the WebApps using a Chromium-based browser than having an Electron-based app running on Flatpak and X11, which is a mess from a security stand-point according to cybersecurity experts.
An error occurred while saving the comment P. Y.
commented
Proton Pass still runs on X11 instead of Wayland. X11 is being deprecated because is old and insecure, Proton apps should run on Wayland. Also, if Proton doesn't want to rely on Flatpak, at least they should have their own deb and rpm repositories (they only have one and is only for Proton VPN)
P. Y.
supported this idea
·
-
106 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment P. Y.
commented
I think Proton not only should support UnifiedPush on Android, but they should also be a push notification distributor for other apps supporting it.
The less relying on Google, the better.
P. Y.
supported this idea
·
-
3,867 votesP. Y.
supported this idea
·
-
275 votesP. Y.
supported this idea
·
-
66 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment P. Y.
commented
I also think the whole Proton suite should be available on Accrescent, especially when Proton Mail stops relying on Google Play Services for push notifications.
P. Y.
supported this idea
·
-
348 votesP. Y.
supported this idea
·
-
303 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment P. Y.
commented
I don't think Proton needs to become a digital bank. However, given how Google is blacklisting secure OSs like GrapheneOS and limiting what apps like Google Wallet can do, I think Proton Wallet should be compatible with bank debit/credit cards in the future.
Having an official F-Droid repo would mitigate the security problems with the main repository. At least you can download the individual apks from their official site using Obtainium. However, I think Proton should focus on the (currently in development) Accrescent store instead.