Uservoice.power
My feedback
127 results found
-
258 votes
Uservoice.power
supported this idea
·
-
358 votes
Uservoice.power
supported this idea
·
-
363 votes
Uservoice.power
supported this idea
·
-
709 votes
Uservoice.power
supported this idea
·
-
769 votes
Uservoice.power
supported this idea
·
-
601 votes
Uservoice.power
supported this idea
·
-
3,007 votes
Proton and Standard Notes are joining forces: https://proton.me/blog/proton-standard-notes-join-forces
Uservoice.power
supported this idea
·
-
863 votes
Uservoice.power
supported this idea
·
-
174 votes
Uservoice.power
supported this idea
·
-
1,273 votes
Uservoice.power
supported this idea
·
-
2,004 votes
Uservoice.power
supported this idea
·
-
1,470 votes
-
2,969 votes
Uservoice.power
supported this idea
·
-
2,129 votes
Uservoice.power
supported this idea
·
-
2,211 votes
We have given this quite a bit of thought, but at the present moment, it is not clear the advantages would outweigh the disadvantages.
The biggest problem is search. Encrypting all metadata would break metadata search entirely on the web client as there is still no efficient way to handle search of encrypted data within a browser.
Secondly, metadata encryption’s value from a privacy standpoint is also somewhat dubious. Because we ultimately must deliver the message to the recipient, we must know who the recipient is. At the current time, there still isn’t any proven and viable way to work around this.
Metadata encryption is an area of continued research for us, and when the opportunity arises and the technology for doing this matures, we will definitely implement it in ProtonMail.
Uservoice.power
supported this idea
·
-
628 votes
Uservoice.power
supported this idea
·
-
52 votes
Uservoice.power
supported this idea
·
-
1,195 votes
This feature is a work in progress.
Uservoice.power
supported this idea
·
-
133 votes
Uservoice.power
supported this idea
·
-
77 votes
Uservoice.power
supported this idea
·