Anders
My feedback
363 results found
-
808 votes
Anders
supported this idea
·
-
1,085 votes
Currently all three of these systems have feature parity; the gap is in terms of UI, and this is something that we have in our plans to close.
Anders
supported this idea
·
-
34 votes
Anders
supported this idea
·
-
206 votes
Anders
supported this idea
·
-
615 votes
Anders
supported this idea
·
-
465 votes
Anders
supported this idea
·
-
534 votes
Anders
supported this idea
·
-
312 votes
Anders
supported this idea
·
-
537 votes
Anders
supported this idea
·
-
948 votes
Anders
supported this idea
·
-
610 votes
Anders
supported this idea
·
-
657 votes
Anders
supported this idea
·
-
749 votes
Anders
supported this idea
·
-
665 votes
Anders
supported this idea
·
-
807 votes
Anders
supported this idea
·
-
749 votes
Anders
supported this idea
·
-
1,874 votes
Anders
supported this idea
·
-
2,088 votes
Anders
supported this idea
·
-
2,189 votes
Anders
supported this idea
·
-
2,188 votes
We have given this quite a bit of thought, but at the present moment, it is not clear the advantages would outweigh the disadvantages.
The biggest problem is search. Encrypting all metadata would break metadata search entirely on the web client as there is still no efficient way to handle search of encrypted data within a browser.
Secondly, metadata encryption’s value from a privacy standpoint is also somewhat dubious. Because we ultimately must deliver the message to the recipient, we must know who the recipient is. At the current time, there still isn’t any proven and viable way to work around this.
Metadata encryption is an area of continued research for us, and when the opportunity arises and the technology for doing this matures, we will definitely implement it in ProtonMail.
Anders
supported this idea
·