Em
My feedback
22 results found
-
6,382 votesEm
supported this idea
·
-
77 votesEm
supported this idea
·
-
134 votesEm
supported this idea
·
-
57 votesEm
supported this idea
·
-
13 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Em
supported this idea
·
-
144 votesEm
supported this idea
·
-
474 votesEm
supported this idea
·
-
38 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Em
commented
I have the exact same issue with my spouse and anyone else I try to bring over to proton.
Noone is going to go through 3+ extra clicks for every event they schedule while out and about just to make sure something is saved to the correct calendar.
I very nearly had my spouse convinced on this service, but now that half their events are on a calender I can't see and they can't share, the whole idea of us having a shared calendar is basically not practical at all.
An error occurred while saving the comment Em
commented
Currently, sharing calenders is a premium feature. This seems fine at face value but creates critical issues with onboarding friends/family members to proton calendar.
The issue is thus:
I can have them make an account and share my calender with them.
Great, they can see my schedule now.
They use the app to schedule an event, it defaults to their only private calendar that they can't remove. I can't see this or plan around it, they also cannot share it without premium.The additional clicks for a new user to change the calander they are saving an event to (every single time they make any individual event) makes protoncalendar very confusing for new users that might not be tech savvy. This completely eliminates any point to persuading others to use the service as it's not easy to organise multiple peoples schedules together in one calendar.
Suggestion: Allow free users to set a paid user's shared calendar as their default calender for new events.
Em
supported this idea
·
-
14 votesEm
supported this idea
·
-
12 votesEm
supported this idea
·
-
716 votesEm
supported this idea
·
-
60 votesEm
supported this idea
·
-
693 votesEm
supported this idea
·
-
84 votesEm
supported this idea
·
-
984 votesEm
supported this idea
·
-
1,062 votesEm
supported this idea
·
-
30 votesEm
supported this idea
·
-
1,765 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Em
commented
This is a pretty good point and partly why I will not move away from keepass. But it doesn't invalidate it as something I'd strongly recommend to my friends that would otherwise just use the same password for everything.
Em
supported this idea
·
-
3,035 votesEm
supported this idea
·
-
3,728 votes
We have given this quite a bit of thought, but at the present moment, it is not clear the advantages would outweigh the disadvantages.
The biggest problem is search. Encrypting all metadata would break metadata search entirely on the web client as there is still no efficient way to handle search of encrypted data within a browser.
Secondly, metadata encryption’s value from a privacy standpoint is also somewhat dubious. Because we ultimately must deliver the message to the recipient, we must know who the recipient is. At the current time, there still isn’t any proven and viable way to work around this.
Metadata encryption is an area of continued research for us, and when the opportunity arises and the technology for doing this matures, we will definitely implement it in ProtonMail.
Em
supported this idea
·
Really annoying to have proton pushing security 'features' that could be attack vectors.
Especially the constant notification about it, you've notified me, so get rid of the dot already.
If I've forgotten my password I'm dead! I want my account to stay inaccessible.