HPZ

My feedback

13 results found

  1. 71 votes
    How important is this to you?
    HPZ supported this idea  · 
  2. 2,652 votes
    How important is this to you?
    HPZ supported this idea  · 
  3. 2,902 votes
    How important is this to you?
    HPZ supported this idea  · 
  4. 3,636 votes
    How important is this to you?
    HPZ supported this idea  · 
  5. 1,136 votes
    How important is this to you?
    HPZ supported this idea  · 
  6. 1,155 votes
    How important is this to you?
    HPZ supported this idea  · 
  7. 1,016 votes
    How important is this to you?
    HPZ supported this idea  · 
  8. 144 votes
    How important is this to you?
    HPZ supported this idea  · 
  9. 276 votes
    How important is this to you?
    HPZ supported this idea  · 
  10. 1,953 votes
    How important is this to you?

    We have given this quite a bit of thought, but at the present moment, it is not clear the advantages would outweigh the disadvantages.

    The biggest problem is search. Encrypting all metadata would break metadata search entirely on the web client as there is still no efficient way to handle search of encrypted data within a browser.

    Secondly, metadata encryption’s value from a privacy standpoint is also somewhat dubious. Because we ultimately must deliver the message to the recipient, we must know who the recipient is. At the current time, there still isn’t any proven and viable way to work around this.

    Metadata encryption is an area of continued research for us, and when the opportunity arises and the technology for doing this matures, we will definitely implement it in ProtonMail.

    HPZ supported this idea  · 
  11. 484 votes
    How important is this to you?
    HPZ supported this idea  · 
  12. 676 votes
    How important is this to you?
    HPZ supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    HPZ commented  · 

    PLEASE!!!!!

  13. 1,111 votes
    How important is this to you?
    HPZ supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base