Leccho
My feedback
51 results found
-
101 votes
Leccho supported this idea ·
-
540 votes
Leccho supported this idea ·
-
209 votes
Leccho supported this idea ·
-
277 votes
Leccho supported this idea ·
-
178 votes
Leccho supported this idea ·
-
62 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Leccho supported this idea ·
-
421 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Leccho commented
Yes! Allow to set different times before erasing
Leccho supported this idea ·
-
69 votes
Leccho supported this idea ·
-
484 votes
Leccho supported this idea ·
-
756 votes
Leccho supported this idea ·
-
804 votes
Leccho supported this idea ·
-
7 votes
Leccho shared this idea ·
-
192 votes
Leccho supported this idea ·
-
197 votes
Leccho supported this idea ·
-
1,032 votes
Leccho supported this idea ·
-
6,374 votes
Leccho supported this idea ·
-
1,848 votes
We have given this quite a bit of thought, but at the present moment, it is not clear the advantages would outweigh the disadvantages.
The biggest problem is search. Encrypting all metadata would break metadata search entirely on the web client as there is still no efficient way to handle search of encrypted data within a browser.
Secondly, metadata encryption’s value from a privacy standpoint is also somewhat dubious. Because we ultimately must deliver the message to the recipient, we must know who the recipient is. At the current time, there still isn’t any proven and viable way to work around this.
Metadata encryption is an area of continued research for us, and when the opportunity arises and the technology for doing this matures, we will definitely implement it in ProtonMail.
Leccho supported this idea ·
-
54 votes
Leccho supported this idea ·
-
180 votes
Leccho supported this idea ·
-
752 votes
Leccho supported this idea ·
I think it should just be allowed to buy extra storage as you need it. Like you sell 1To for X amount of dollar and you can add as many as wished.