n_m
My feedback
109 results found
-
457 votes
n_m
supported this idea
·
-
469 votes
n_m
supported this idea
·
-
302 votes
n_m
supported this idea
·
-
474 votes
n_m
supported this idea
·
-
479 votes
n_m
supported this idea
·
-
685 votes
n_m
supported this idea
·
-
88 votes
n_m
supported this idea
·
-
108 votes
n_m
supported this idea
·
-
358 votes
n_m
supported this idea
·
-
1,210 votes
n_m
supported this idea
·
-
281 votes
n_m
supported this idea
·
-
686 votes
n_m
supported this idea
·
-
644 votes
n_m
supported this idea
·
-
856 votes
n_m
supported this idea
·
-
764 votes
n_m
supported this idea
·
-
1,104 votes
n_m
supported this idea
·
-
1,153 votes
n_m
supported this idea
·
-
3,953 votes
n_m
supported this idea
·
-
2,173 votes
We have given this quite a bit of thought, but at the present moment, it is not clear the advantages would outweigh the disadvantages.
The biggest problem is search. Encrypting all metadata would break metadata search entirely on the web client as there is still no efficient way to handle search of encrypted data within a browser.
Secondly, metadata encryption’s value from a privacy standpoint is also somewhat dubious. Because we ultimately must deliver the message to the recipient, we must know who the recipient is. At the current time, there still isn’t any proven and viable way to work around this.
Metadata encryption is an area of continued research for us, and when the opportunity arises and the technology for doing this matures, we will definitely implement it in ProtonMail.
n_m
supported this idea
·
-
1,276 votes
We are reviewing this idea to get closer to a clean inbox for all our users. We will let you know once we have more updates
n_m
supported this idea
·