B
My feedback
17 results found
-
90 votesB
supported this idea
·
-
580 votesB
supported this idea
·
-
5 votesB
shared this idea
·
-
1,298 votesB
supported this idea
·
-
1,830 votesB
supported this idea
·
-
933 votesB
supported this idea
·
-
1,278 votesB
supported this idea
·
-
777 votesB
supported this idea
·
-
363 votes
Hi everyone, this one is under consideration, pending anti-spam measures we might need to take.
B
supported this idea
·
-
1,800 votesB
supported this idea
·
-
3,553 votesB
supported this idea
·
-
2,196 votes
We have given this quite a bit of thought, but at the present moment, it is not clear the advantages would outweigh the disadvantages.
The biggest problem is search. Encrypting all metadata would break metadata search entirely on the web client as there is still no efficient way to handle search of encrypted data within a browser.
Secondly, metadata encryption’s value from a privacy standpoint is also somewhat dubious. Because we ultimately must deliver the message to the recipient, we must know who the recipient is. At the current time, there still isn’t any proven and viable way to work around this.
Metadata encryption is an area of continued research for us, and when the opportunity arises and the technology for doing this matures, we will definitely implement it in ProtonMail.
B
supported this idea
·
-
6,848 votesB
supported this idea
·
-
550 votesB
supported this idea
·
-
2,971 votes
Proton and Standard Notes are joining forces: https://proton.me/blog/proton-standard-notes-join-forces
B
supported this idea
·
-
1,328 votesB
supported this idea
·
-
812 votesB
supported this idea
·
