Tim
My feedback
70 results found
-
33 votesTim
supported this idea
·
-
5 votesTim
supported this idea
·
-
19 votesTim
supported this idea
·
-
39 votesTim
supported this idea
·
-
356 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Tim
supported this idea
·
-
169 votesTim
supported this idea
·
-
349 votes
https://protonvpn.com/support/linux-beta
Tim
supported this idea
·
-
717 votesTim
supported this idea
·
-
379 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Tim
commented
They sort of already do, as long as they keep grandfathering subscribers into the rate they are paying now, even as rates for new subscribers rise. Over time, that may end up being a significant discount if they keep honoring that.
-
17 votesTim
supported this idea
·
-
587 votesTim
supported this idea
·
-
146 votesTim
supported this idea
·
-
167 votesTim
supported this idea
·
-
219 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Tim
commented
I'd rarely use it for English, but I agree totally (I could potentially use it if I needed to reply in a language other than English). If Duo and Family are supposed to be "same as Unlimited, but with more of it for more users", then if a feature is included in Duo and Family, it should be in Unlimited as well.
An error occurred while saving the comment Tim
commented
The current model seems to suggest that no one who has a standalone plan for one person needs this, or that a single individual should have to pay for a subscription for two people to get this, even if they are only one person.
What a silly model. Makes Unlimited a lot less, well…. unlimited.
Tim
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Tim
commented
Yes, it doesn’t make a lot of sense to me that a Duo plan would have features that Unlimited does not. Yes, maybe they get more storage or more addresses or more domains or whatever. But the feature set should be the same.
-
14 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Tim
commented
And to add on to this, I think people who subscribe to the VPN service (or have Unlimited/Duo/Family) should be able to opt into dedicated/static IP service on personal accounts, even if it costs a bit more. Many other VPN services are rolling this out for maybe US$3-4 a month -- would be great to have this option to greatly reduce the number of blocked connections and those infernal captchas.
Tim
supported this idea
·
-
11 votesTim
supported this idea
·
-
679 votesTim
supported this idea
·
-
3 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Tim
commented
I'd like to add some for Oregon as well. The closest ones default to Washington state and California, and that means (among other things) that placing online orders default to charging sales tax until I override it. (There is no sales tax in Oregon.).
-
1,063 votes
Currently all three of these systems have feature parity; the gap is in terms of UI, and this is something that we have in our plans to close.
Tim
supported this idea
·
-
7 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Tim
commented
Unlimited users should not have to pay one cent more to get it if it is part of the Duo plan. This isn’t a feature that is only useful if you are using it across a couple or a family.
I’m not going to pay for the premium Lumo service until and unless I can trial it for at least 7 days, and 14 would be better. I think a *reasonable* discount for Unlimited and higher subscribers should be considered, but really, I’d like a free trial of the full product.