Internet_migration
My feedback
23 results found
-
1,078 votesInternet_migration supported this idea ·
-
2,814 votesInternet_migration supported this idea ·
-
998 votesInternet_migration supported this idea ·
-
18,341 votesInternet_migration supported this idea ·
-
258 votesInternet_migration supported this idea ·
-
806 votesInternet_migration supported this idea ·
-
6,384 votesInternet_migration supported this idea ·
-
7,745 votesInternet_migration supported this idea ·
-
10,409 votes
We plan on adding additional payment options going forward.
Internet_migration supported this idea · -
1,000 votesInternet_migration supported this idea ·
-
3,666 votesInternet_migration supported this idea ·
-
7,748 votesInternet_migration supported this idea ·
-
1,815 votesInternet_migration supported this idea ·
-
3,070 votesInternet_migration supported this idea ·
-
1,460 votesInternet_migration supported this idea ·
-
5,084 votesInternet_migration supported this idea ·
-
3,728 votes
We have given this quite a bit of thought, but at the present moment, it is not clear the advantages would outweigh the disadvantages.
The biggest problem is search. Encrypting all metadata would break metadata search entirely on the web client as there is still no efficient way to handle search of encrypted data within a browser.
Secondly, metadata encryption’s value from a privacy standpoint is also somewhat dubious. Because we ultimately must deliver the message to the recipient, we must know who the recipient is. At the current time, there still isn’t any proven and viable way to work around this.
Metadata encryption is an area of continued research for us, and when the opportunity arises and the technology for doing this matures, we will definitely implement it in ProtonMail.
Internet_migration supported this idea · -
15,600 votesInternet_migration supported this idea ·
-
398 votesInternet_migration shared this idea ·
-
35 votesInternet_migration supported this idea ·