Sank490
My feedback
36 results found
-
177 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
586 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
704 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
55 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
14 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
842 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
772 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
231 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
536 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
86 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
3 votes
Sank490
shared this idea
·
-
1,103 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
235 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
715 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
1,509 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
300 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
796 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
874 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
2,130 votes
We have given this quite a bit of thought, but at the present moment, it is not clear the advantages would outweigh the disadvantages.
The biggest problem is search. Encrypting all metadata would break metadata search entirely on the web client as there is still no efficient way to handle search of encrypted data within a browser.
Secondly, metadata encryption’s value from a privacy standpoint is also somewhat dubious. Because we ultimately must deliver the message to the recipient, we must know who the recipient is. At the current time, there still isn’t any proven and viable way to work around this.
Metadata encryption is an area of continued research for us, and when the opportunity arises and the technology for doing this matures, we will definitely implement it in ProtonMail.
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
48 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·