Sank490
My feedback
32 results found
-
187 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
601 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
766 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
55 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
15 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
1,140 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
810 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
243 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
3 votes
Sank490
shared this idea
·
-
1,207 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
747 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
1,585 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
303 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
1,090 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
913 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
2,163 votes
We have given this quite a bit of thought, but at the present moment, it is not clear the advantages would outweigh the disadvantages.
The biggest problem is search. Encrypting all metadata would break metadata search entirely on the web client as there is still no efficient way to handle search of encrypted data within a browser.
Secondly, metadata encryption’s value from a privacy standpoint is also somewhat dubious. Because we ultimately must deliver the message to the recipient, we must know who the recipient is. At the current time, there still isn’t any proven and viable way to work around this.
Metadata encryption is an area of continued research for us, and when the opportunity arises and the technology for doing this matures, we will definitely implement it in ProtonMail.
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
48 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
63 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
90 votes
At this point, security questions have been shown to not be an effective way to validate a users identity. At this time the recovery email address is our sole means of identifying users ownership of an account.
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
393 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·