Sank490
My feedback
37 results found
-
161 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
574 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
574 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
53 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
14 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
640 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
730 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
211 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
499 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
84 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
3 votes
Sank490
shared this idea
·
-
1,021 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
222 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
699 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
1,446 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
298 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
756 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
834 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
2,109 votes
We have given this quite a bit of thought, but at the present moment, it is not clear the advantages would outweigh the disadvantages.
The biggest problem is search. Encrypting all metadata would break metadata search entirely on the web client as there is still no efficient way to handle search of encrypted data within a browser.
Secondly, metadata encryption’s value from a privacy standpoint is also somewhat dubious. Because we ultimately must deliver the message to the recipient, we must know who the recipient is. At the current time, there still isn’t any proven and viable way to work around this.
Metadata encryption is an area of continued research for us, and when the opportunity arises and the technology for doing this matures, we will definitely implement it in ProtonMail.
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
47 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·