Sank490
My feedback
37 results found
-
169 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
579 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
597 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
53 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
14 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
759 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
759 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
225 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
516 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
85 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
3 votes
Sank490
shared this idea
·
-
1,060 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
230 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
705 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
1,492 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
298 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
772 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
853 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
2,122 votes
We have given this quite a bit of thought, but at the present moment, it is not clear the advantages would outweigh the disadvantages.
The biggest problem is search. Encrypting all metadata would break metadata search entirely on the web client as there is still no efficient way to handle search of encrypted data within a browser.
Secondly, metadata encryption’s value from a privacy standpoint is also somewhat dubious. Because we ultimately must deliver the message to the recipient, we must know who the recipient is. At the current time, there still isn’t any proven and viable way to work around this.
Metadata encryption is an area of continued research for us, and when the opportunity arises and the technology for doing this matures, we will definitely implement it in ProtonMail.
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
48 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·