Sank490
My feedback
33 results found
-
183 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
589 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
728 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
55 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
14 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
965 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
788 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
236 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
554 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
3 votes
Sank490
shared this idea
·
-
1,152 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
731 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
1,550 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
302 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
821 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
891 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
2,140 votes
We have given this quite a bit of thought, but at the present moment, it is not clear the advantages would outweigh the disadvantages.
The biggest problem is search. Encrypting all metadata would break metadata search entirely on the web client as there is still no efficient way to handle search of encrypted data within a browser.
Secondly, metadata encryption’s value from a privacy standpoint is also somewhat dubious. Because we ultimately must deliver the message to the recipient, we must know who the recipient is. At the current time, there still isn’t any proven and viable way to work around this.
Metadata encryption is an area of continued research for us, and when the opportunity arises and the technology for doing this matures, we will definitely implement it in ProtonMail.
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
48 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
63 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
88 votes
At this point, security questions have been shown to not be an effective way to validate a users identity. At this time the recovery email address is our sole means of identifying users ownership of an account.
Sank490
supported this idea
·