Sank490
My feedback
30 results found
-
126 votesSank490 supported this idea ·
-
341 votesSank490 supported this idea ·
-
342 votesSank490 supported this idea ·
-
285 votesSank490 supported this idea ·
-
258 votesSank490 supported this idea ·
-
46 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Sank490 supported this idea · -
317 votesSank490 supported this idea ·
-
28 votesSank490 supported this idea ·
-
1,926 votes
We have given this quite a bit of thought, but at the present moment, it is not clear the advantages would outweigh the disadvantages.
The biggest problem is search. Encrypting all metadata would break metadata search entirely on the web client as there is still no efficient way to handle search of encrypted data within a browser.
Secondly, metadata encryption’s value from a privacy standpoint is also somewhat dubious. Because we ultimately must deliver the message to the recipient, we must know who the recipient is. At the current time, there still isn’t any proven and viable way to work around this.
Metadata encryption is an area of continued research for us, and when the opportunity arises and the technology for doing this matures, we will definitely implement it in ProtonMail.
Sank490 supported this idea · -
40 votesSank490 supported this idea ·
-
56 votesSank490 supported this idea ·
-
73 votes
At this point, security questions have been shown to not be an effective way to validate a users identity. At this time the recovery email address is our sole means of identifying users ownership of an account.
Sank490 supported this idea · -
359 votesSank490 supported this idea ·
-
122 votesSank490 supported this idea ·
-
374 votesSank490 supported this idea ·
-
165 votesSank490 supported this idea ·
-
968 votesSank490 supported this idea ·
-
689 votesSank490 supported this idea ·
-
1,088 votesSank490 supported this idea ·
-
2,080 votesSank490 supported this idea ·
Plus ... ability to convert proprietary formats to ODF