Adrian
My feedback
38 results found
-
592 votes
Adrian
supported this idea
·
-
159 votes
Adrian
supported this idea
·
-
192 votes
Adrian
supported this idea
·
-
261 votes
Adrian
supported this idea
·
-
278 votes
Adrian
supported this idea
·
-
355 votes
Adrian
supported this idea
·
-
552 votes
Adrian
supported this idea
·
-
578 votes
Adrian
supported this idea
·
-
845 votes
Adrian
supported this idea
·
-
1,264 votes
Adrian
supported this idea
·
-
2,061 votes
Proton and Standard Notes are joining forces: https://proton.me/blog/proton-standard-notes-join-forces
Adrian
supported this idea
·
-
2,558 votes
Adrian
supported this idea
·
-
4,120 votes
Adrian
supported this idea
·
-
9 votes
Adrian
supported this idea
·
-
39 votes
Adrian
supported this idea
·
-
92 votes
Adrian
supported this idea
·
-
627 votes
Adrian
supported this idea
·
-
696 votes
Adrian
supported this idea
·
-
2,103 votes
We have given this quite a bit of thought, but at the present moment, it is not clear the advantages would outweigh the disadvantages.
The biggest problem is search. Encrypting all metadata would break metadata search entirely on the web client as there is still no efficient way to handle search of encrypted data within a browser.
Secondly, metadata encryption’s value from a privacy standpoint is also somewhat dubious. Because we ultimately must deliver the message to the recipient, we must know who the recipient is. At the current time, there still isn’t any proven and viable way to work around this.
Metadata encryption is an area of continued research for us, and when the opportunity arises and the technology for doing this matures, we will definitely implement it in ProtonMail.
Adrian
supported this idea
·
-
3,619 votes
Adrian
supported this idea
·