J
My feedback
20 results found
-
615 votesJ
supported this idea
·
-
1,900 votesJ
supported this idea
·
-
1,122 votesJ
supported this idea
·
-
334 votesJ
supported this idea
·
-
231 votesJ
supported this idea
·
-
251 votesJ
supported this idea
·
-
39 votesJ
shared this idea
·
-
480 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment -
8 votesJ
shared this idea
·
-
407 votesJ
supported this idea
·
-
372 votesJ
supported this idea
·
-
798 votesJ
supported this idea
·
-
2,760 votesJ
supported this idea
·
-
755 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment J
commented
There already is a linux desktop app for debian and for RHEL/fedora
-
1,915 votesJ
supported this idea
·
-
2,883 votesJ
supported this idea
·
-
1,091 votes
Currently all three of these systems have feature parity; the gap is in terms of UI, and this is something that we have in our plans to close.
J
supported this idea
·
-
1,953 votesJ
supported this idea
·
-
232 votesJ
supported this idea
·
-
2,954 votesJ
supported this idea
·
I think it is perfectly fine that Lumo is not included in the Unlimited plan. I can easily see how running Lumo is so costly that it needs Proton to charge extra - that's fine. Compared to other private AI offers, Lumo is actually on the cheap side (Leo AI Premium: 14.99$/month, Kagi Ultimate: 25$ + taxes/month).
In fact, long-term users who want Proton and Lumo to succeed should have an interest in the financing being sustainable. The current solution seems better than the alternatives: adding Lumo Plus to Proton Unlimited without increasing the price of Unlimited is not financially sustainable. Adding Lumo Plus to Proton Unlimited and increasing the cost so much that it becomes financially sustainable is also a bad idea, as this would require the price of Unlimited to more than double just to finance a product that many Unlimited users might not want to pay for. (I myself would reconsider paying for Proton Unlimited if I was suddenly forced into a subscription to Lumo Plus in this way.)
If there is a legal risk, because the name 'Unlimited' might now be seen to be deceptive, then, sure, change it. Personally, I could not care less about this.