Leccho
My feedback
90 results found
-
401 votesLeccho
supported this idea
·
-
926 votesLeccho
supported this idea
·
-
1,948 votes
As per the Spring/Summer Roadmap, this is being developed: https://proton.me/blog/pass-roadmap-spring-summer-2026
Folders will be a significant building block for Proton Pass that will go beyond just helping you organize your items. Introducing folders will require some rethinking of our cryptography model, which we’re currently working on. Eventually, you’ll also be able to share folders and subfolders just like your vaults and individual items, giving you another flexible way to share access.
Folders will be available in the coming months. As well as creating vaults, you’ll be able to create dedicated folders and subfolders to organize crucial information for quick retrieval: you can organize by project, by team, by year, or whatever else you need.
Leccho
supported this idea
·
-
1,881 votes
-
558 votesLeccho
supported this idea
·
-
6,792 votesLeccho
supported this idea
·
-
2,161 votes
We have given this quite a bit of thought, but at the present moment, it is not clear the advantages would outweigh the disadvantages.
The biggest problem is search. Encrypting all metadata would break metadata search entirely on the web client as there is still no efficient way to handle search of encrypted data within a browser.
Secondly, metadata encryption’s value from a privacy standpoint is also somewhat dubious. Because we ultimately must deliver the message to the recipient, we must know who the recipient is. At the current time, there still isn’t any proven and viable way to work around this.
Metadata encryption is an area of continued research for us, and when the opportunity arises and the technology for doing this matures, we will definitely implement it in ProtonMail.
Leccho
supported this idea
·
-
1,706 votesLeccho
supported this idea
·
-
1,332 votesLeccho
supported this idea
·
-
2,704 votesLeccho
supported this idea
·
-
738 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Leccho
supported this idea
·
-
1,891 votesLeccho
supported this idea
·
-
152 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Leccho
commented
Clearly they don't make price for 2 users. You'll get a price for 3 to 6 users. They're not charging that much if you look at the industry prices. If you're not satisfied with pricing, there are free tiers which meet most use cases. The only way they could change pricing is by offering no free tiers...
-
34 votesLeccho
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Leccho
commented
This is basically VOIP. We should be able to transfer our phone number. I would add call recording options. We can't encrypt calls and sms unless they are also proton users, but we can encrypt saved recording, call history and local text messages.
-
281 votesLeccho
supported this idea
·
-
494 votesLeccho
supported this idea
·
-
1,576 votesLeccho
supported this idea
·
-
218 votesLeccho
supported this idea
·
-
1,066 votes
Currently all three of these systems have feature parity; the gap is in terms of UI, and this is something that we have in our plans to close.
Leccho
supported this idea
·
-
2,667 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Leccho
commented
I find the two-password mode for the mailbox a bit excessive, but it's certainly necessary for a password manager. Therefore, I would like to have the option to enable this feature exclusively for the password manager. This way, there would be one password for logging into the account and another for decrypting the stored passwords.
I'm currently using the PIN, but it's only active locally and not that secure.
yes please