Anonymous
My feedback
105 results found
-
720 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
2,991 votes
Proton and Standard Notes are joining forces: https://proton.me/blog/proton-standard-notes-join-forces
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
2,048 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
168 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
222 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
36 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
7 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
108 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
6 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
6 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
226 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
539 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
824 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
1,093 votes
Currently all three of these systems have feature parity; the gap is in terms of UI, and this is something that we have in our plans to close.
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
567 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
171 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment
Anonymous
commented
Here are some additional recommendations for improvements to search:
In "More search options":
- Add a "Email Subject" filter field that uses freeform text
- Add a "Email Body" or "Email Content" filter field that uses freeform text
- Add a "Has attachment" filter field that uses boolean operators
- Add a "Attachment Type" filter field that uses either drop down with predetermined options or freeform text -
205 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
19 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
692 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
1,196 votes
This feature is a work in progress.
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
On the desktop app, when expanding search using the "More search options"
It only exposes From (date), To (date), Sender, and Recipient, search fields.
These are a good start but need Subject and Body fields search options (even if downloading messages locally is required) to really be fully featured.