n_m
My feedback
108 results found
-
476 votes
n_m
supported this idea
·
-
492 votes
n_m
supported this idea
·
-
340 votes
n_m
supported this idea
·
-
519 votes
n_m
supported this idea
·
-
501 votes
n_m
supported this idea
·
-
727 votes
n_m
supported this idea
·
-
95 votes
n_m
supported this idea
·
-
120 votes
n_m
supported this idea
·
-
376 votes
n_m
supported this idea
·
-
1,262 votes
n_m
supported this idea
·
-
282 votes
n_m
supported this idea
·
-
688 votes
n_m
supported this idea
·
-
663 votes
n_m
supported this idea
·
-
870 votes
n_m
supported this idea
·
-
810 votes
n_m
supported this idea
·
-
1,163 votes
n_m
supported this idea
·
-
1,195 votes
n_m
supported this idea
·
-
3,993 votes
n_m
supported this idea
·
-
2,177 votes
We have given this quite a bit of thought, but at the present moment, it is not clear the advantages would outweigh the disadvantages.
The biggest problem is search. Encrypting all metadata would break metadata search entirely on the web client as there is still no efficient way to handle search of encrypted data within a browser.
Secondly, metadata encryption’s value from a privacy standpoint is also somewhat dubious. Because we ultimately must deliver the message to the recipient, we must know who the recipient is. At the current time, there still isn’t any proven and viable way to work around this.
Metadata encryption is an area of continued research for us, and when the opportunity arises and the technology for doing this matures, we will definitely implement it in ProtonMail.
n_m
supported this idea
·
-
1,283 votes
We are reviewing this idea to get closer to a clean inbox for all our users. We will let you know once we have more updates
n_m
supported this idea
·