Sank490
My feedback
37 results found
-
146 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
560 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
537 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
51 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
14 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
459 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
689 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
180 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
448 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
84 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
3 votes
Sank490
shared this idea
·
-
930 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
217 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
680 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
1,388 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
297 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
685 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
785 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
2,083 votes
We have given this quite a bit of thought, but at the present moment, it is not clear the advantages would outweigh the disadvantages.
The biggest problem is search. Encrypting all metadata would break metadata search entirely on the web client as there is still no efficient way to handle search of encrypted data within a browser.
Secondly, metadata encryption’s value from a privacy standpoint is also somewhat dubious. Because we ultimately must deliver the message to the recipient, we must know who the recipient is. At the current time, there still isn’t any proven and viable way to work around this.
Metadata encryption is an area of continued research for us, and when the opportunity arises and the technology for doing this matures, we will definitely implement it in ProtonMail.
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
47 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·