Sank490
My feedback
32 results found
-
200 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
609 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
784 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
56 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
15 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
1,266 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
824 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
247 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
3 votes
Sank490
shared this idea
·
-
1,252 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
753 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
1,617 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
304 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
1,114 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
930 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
2,178 votes
We have given this quite a bit of thought, but at the present moment, it is not clear the advantages would outweigh the disadvantages.
The biggest problem is search. Encrypting all metadata would break metadata search entirely on the web client as there is still no efficient way to handle search of encrypted data within a browser.
Secondly, metadata encryption’s value from a privacy standpoint is also somewhat dubious. Because we ultimately must deliver the message to the recipient, we must know who the recipient is. At the current time, there still isn’t any proven and viable way to work around this.
Metadata encryption is an area of continued research for us, and when the opportunity arises and the technology for doing this matures, we will definitely implement it in ProtonMail.
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
48 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
63 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
91 votes
At this point, security questions have been shown to not be an effective way to validate a users identity. At this time the recovery email address is our sole means of identifying users ownership of an account.
Sank490
supported this idea
·
-
395 votes
Sank490
supported this idea
·