Armando
My feedback
54 results found
-
306 votes
Armando
supported this idea
·
-
247 votes
Armando
supported this idea
·
-
377 votes
Armando
supported this idea
·
-
317 votes
Armando
supported this idea
·
-
355 votes
Armando
supported this idea
·
-
160 votes
Armando
supported this idea
·
-
201 votes
Armando
supported this idea
·
-
254 votes
Armando
supported this idea
·
-
341 votes
https://protonvpn.com/support/linux-beta
Armando
supported this idea
·
-
386 votes
Will be available on Android and Windows shortly, and is part of the 2025 Spring & Summer VPN Roadmap.
Armando
supported this idea
·
-
416 votes
Armando
supported this idea
·
-
532 votes
Armando
supported this idea
·
-
573 votes
Armando
supported this idea
·
-
715 votes
Armando
supported this idea
·
-
686 votes
Armando
supported this idea
·
-
766 votes
Armando
supported this idea
·
-
1,022 votes
Armando
supported this idea
·
-
1,603 votes
Armando
supported this idea
·
-
1,200 votes
We are reviewing this idea to get closer to a clean inbox for all our users. We will let you know once we have more updates
Armando
supported this idea
·
-
2,130 votes
We have given this quite a bit of thought, but at the present moment, it is not clear the advantages would outweigh the disadvantages.
The biggest problem is search. Encrypting all metadata would break metadata search entirely on the web client as there is still no efficient way to handle search of encrypted data within a browser.
Secondly, metadata encryption’s value from a privacy standpoint is also somewhat dubious. Because we ultimately must deliver the message to the recipient, we must know who the recipient is. At the current time, there still isn’t any proven and viable way to work around this.
Metadata encryption is an area of continued research for us, and when the opportunity arises and the technology for doing this matures, we will definitely implement it in ProtonMail.
Armando
supported this idea
·