Anonymous
My feedback
31 results found
-
6 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
3 votes
Anonymous
shared this idea
·
-
436 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
1,252 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
785 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
1,464 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
2,962 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
624 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
940 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
936 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
1,292 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
1,256 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
1,962 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
2,989 votes
Proton and Standard Notes are joining forces: https://proton.me/blog/proton-standard-notes-join-forces
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
1,667 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
1,426 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
2,137 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
2,207 votes
We have given this quite a bit of thought, but at the present moment, it is not clear the advantages would outweigh the disadvantages.
The biggest problem is search. Encrypting all metadata would break metadata search entirely on the web client as there is still no efficient way to handle search of encrypted data within a browser.
Secondly, metadata encryption’s value from a privacy standpoint is also somewhat dubious. Because we ultimately must deliver the message to the recipient, we must know who the recipient is. At the current time, there still isn’t any proven and viable way to work around this.
Metadata encryption is an area of continued research for us, and when the opportunity arises and the technology for doing this matures, we will definitely implement it in ProtonMail.
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
3,580 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
79 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·