Anonymous
My feedback
31 results found
-
5 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
3 votes
Anonymous
shared this idea
·
-
431 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
1,186 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
760 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
1,438 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
2,929 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
613 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
932 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
929 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
1,265 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
1,242 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
1,935 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
2,959 votes
Proton and Standard Notes are joining forces: https://proton.me/blog/proton-standard-notes-join-forces
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
1,629 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
1,407 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
2,083 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
2,185 votes
We have given this quite a bit of thought, but at the present moment, it is not clear the advantages would outweigh the disadvantages.
The biggest problem is search. Encrypting all metadata would break metadata search entirely on the web client as there is still no efficient way to handle search of encrypted data within a browser.
Secondly, metadata encryption’s value from a privacy standpoint is also somewhat dubious. Because we ultimately must deliver the message to the recipient, we must know who the recipient is. At the current time, there still isn’t any proven and viable way to work around this.
Metadata encryption is an area of continued research for us, and when the opportunity arises and the technology for doing this matures, we will definitely implement it in ProtonMail.
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
3,517 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
79 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·