Anonymous
My feedback
31 results found
-
4 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
3 votes
Anonymous
shared this idea
·
-
422 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
1,081 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
746 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
1,425 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
2,888 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
604 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
917 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
921 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
1,227 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
1,221 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
1,903 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
2,916 votes
Proton and Standard Notes are joining forces: https://proton.me/blog/proton-standard-notes-join-forces
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
1,601 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
1,392 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
2,035 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
2,173 votes
We have given this quite a bit of thought, but at the present moment, it is not clear the advantages would outweigh the disadvantages.
The biggest problem is search. Encrypting all metadata would break metadata search entirely on the web client as there is still no efficient way to handle search of encrypted data within a browser.
Secondly, metadata encryption’s value from a privacy standpoint is also somewhat dubious. Because we ultimately must deliver the message to the recipient, we must know who the recipient is. At the current time, there still isn’t any proven and viable way to work around this.
Metadata encryption is an area of continued research for us, and when the opportunity arises and the technology for doing this matures, we will definitely implement it in ProtonMail.
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
3,450 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
79 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·