Anonymous
My feedback
31 results found
-
5 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
3 votes
Anonymous
shared this idea
·
-
434 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
1,215 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
767 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
1,453 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
2,951 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
620 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
935 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
932 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
1,277 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
1,254 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
1,950 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
2,970 votes
Proton and Standard Notes are joining forces: https://proton.me/blog/proton-standard-notes-join-forces
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
1,645 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
1,414 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
2,111 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
2,196 votes
We have given this quite a bit of thought, but at the present moment, it is not clear the advantages would outweigh the disadvantages.
The biggest problem is search. Encrypting all metadata would break metadata search entirely on the web client as there is still no efficient way to handle search of encrypted data within a browser.
Secondly, metadata encryption’s value from a privacy standpoint is also somewhat dubious. Because we ultimately must deliver the message to the recipient, we must know who the recipient is. At the current time, there still isn’t any proven and viable way to work around this.
Metadata encryption is an area of continued research for us, and when the opportunity arises and the technology for doing this matures, we will definitely implement it in ProtonMail.
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
3,552 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
79 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·