B9
My feedback
86 results found
-
853 votes
B9
supported this idea
·
-
2,964 votes
B9
supported this idea
·
-
2,049 votes
B9
supported this idea
·
-
2 votes
B9
shared this idea
·
-
586 votes
B9
supported this idea
·
-
3,032 votes
Partially rolled out, as per: https://proton.me/support/pass-offline-access
As per the Spring/Summer Roadmap this will extend out to the Pass Extension: https://proton.me/blog/pass-roadmap-spring-summer-2026
B9
supported this idea
·
-
315 votes
B9
supported this idea
·
-
407 votes
B9
supported this idea
·
-
539 votes
B9
supported this idea
·
-
567 votes
B9
supported this idea
·
-
584 votes
B9
supported this idea
·
-
1,094 votes
Currently all three of these systems have feature parity; the gap is in terms of UI, and this is something that we have in our plans to close.
B9
supported this idea
·
-
2,143 votes
B9
supported this idea
·
-
2,208 votes
We have given this quite a bit of thought, but at the present moment, it is not clear the advantages would outweigh the disadvantages.
The biggest problem is search. Encrypting all metadata would break metadata search entirely on the web client as there is still no efficient way to handle search of encrypted data within a browser.
Secondly, metadata encryption’s value from a privacy standpoint is also somewhat dubious. Because we ultimately must deliver the message to the recipient, we must know who the recipient is. At the current time, there still isn’t any proven and viable way to work around this.
Metadata encryption is an area of continued research for us, and when the opportunity arises and the technology for doing this matures, we will definitely implement it in ProtonMail.
B9
supported this idea
·
-
3,584 votes
B9
supported this idea
·
-
4,101 votes
B9
supported this idea
·
-
6,856 votes
B9
supported this idea
·
-
536 votes
B9
supported this idea
·
-
624 votes
B9
supported this idea
·
-
808 votes
B9
supported this idea
·