Mac
My feedback
24 results found
-
410 votesMac
supported this idea
·
-
532 votesMac
supported this idea
·
-
1,076 votes
Currently all three of these systems have feature parity; the gap is in terms of UI, and this is something that we have in our plans to close.
Mac
supported this idea
·
-
2,965 votes
Partially rolled out, as per: https://proton.me/support/pass-offline-access
As per the Spring/Summer Roadmap this will extend out to the Pass Extension: https://proton.me/blog/pass-roadmap-spring-summer-2026
Mac
supported this idea
·
-
665 votesMac
supported this idea
·
-
1,613 votesMac
supported this idea
·
-
865 votesMac
supported this idea
·
-
224 votesMac
supported this idea
·
-
424 votesMac
supported this idea
·
-
676 votesMac
supported this idea
·
-
735 votesMac
supported this idea
·
-
679 votesMac
supported this idea
·
-
1,614 votesMac
supported this idea
·
-
634 votesMac
supported this idea
·
-
1,922 votesMac
supported this idea
·
-
1,001 votesMac
supported this idea
·
-
2,177 votes
We have given this quite a bit of thought, but at the present moment, it is not clear the advantages would outweigh the disadvantages.
The biggest problem is search. Encrypting all metadata would break metadata search entirely on the web client as there is still no efficient way to handle search of encrypted data within a browser.
Secondly, metadata encryption’s value from a privacy standpoint is also somewhat dubious. Because we ultimately must deliver the message to the recipient, we must know who the recipient is. At the current time, there still isn’t any proven and viable way to work around this.
Metadata encryption is an area of continued research for us, and when the opportunity arises and the technology for doing this matures, we will definitely implement it in ProtonMail.
Mac
supported this idea
·
-
2,080 votesMac
supported this idea
·
-
2,062 votesMac
supported this idea
·
-
2,942 votes
Proton and Standard Notes are joining forces: https://proton.me/blog/proton-standard-notes-join-forces
Mac
supported this idea
·
