Mac
My feedback
24 results found
-
410 votesMac
supported this idea
·
-
524 votesMac
supported this idea
·
-
1,072 votes
Currently all three of these systems have feature parity; the gap is in terms of UI, and this is something that we have in our plans to close.
Mac
supported this idea
·
-
2,948 votes
Partially rolled out, as per: https://proton.me/support/pass-offline-access
As per the Spring/Summer Roadmap this will extend out to the Pass Extension: https://proton.me/blog/pass-roadmap-spring-summer-2026
Mac
supported this idea
·
-
660 votesMac
supported this idea
·
-
1,601 votesMac
supported this idea
·
-
819 votesMac
supported this idea
·
-
222 votesMac
supported this idea
·
-
417 votesMac
supported this idea
·
-
675 votesMac
supported this idea
·
-
725 votesMac
supported this idea
·
-
678 votesMac
supported this idea
·
-
1,596 votesMac
supported this idea
·
-
627 votesMac
supported this idea
·
-
1,906 votesMac
supported this idea
·
-
995 votesMac
supported this idea
·
-
2,173 votes
We have given this quite a bit of thought, but at the present moment, it is not clear the advantages would outweigh the disadvantages.
The biggest problem is search. Encrypting all metadata would break metadata search entirely on the web client as there is still no efficient way to handle search of encrypted data within a browser.
Secondly, metadata encryption’s value from a privacy standpoint is also somewhat dubious. Because we ultimately must deliver the message to the recipient, we must know who the recipient is. At the current time, there still isn’t any proven and viable way to work around this.
Metadata encryption is an area of continued research for us, and when the opportunity arises and the technology for doing this matures, we will definitely implement it in ProtonMail.
Mac
supported this idea
·
-
2,075 votesMac
supported this idea
·
-
2,038 votesMac
supported this idea
·
-
2,920 votes
Proton and Standard Notes are joining forces: https://proton.me/blog/proton-standard-notes-join-forces
Mac
supported this idea
·
