Nicolas
My feedback
13 results found
-
560 votesNicolas supported this idea ·
-
1,125 votesNicolas supported this idea ·
-
3,729 votes
We have given this quite a bit of thought, but at the present moment, it is not clear the advantages would outweigh the disadvantages.
The biggest problem is search. Encrypting all metadata would break metadata search entirely on the web client as there is still no efficient way to handle search of encrypted data within a browser.
Secondly, metadata encryption’s value from a privacy standpoint is also somewhat dubious. Because we ultimately must deliver the message to the recipient, we must know who the recipient is. At the current time, there still isn’t any proven and viable way to work around this.
Metadata encryption is an area of continued research for us, and when the opportunity arises and the technology for doing this matures, we will definitely implement it in ProtonMail.
Nicolas supported this idea · -
2,330 votesNicolas supported this idea ·
-
39 votesNicolas supported this idea ·
-
850 votesNicolas supported this idea ·
-
391 votesNicolas supported this idea ·
-
1,885 votesNicolas supported this idea ·
-
3,119 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Nicolas supported this idea · -
736 votesNicolas supported this idea ·
-
1,483 votesNicolas supported this idea ·
-
5,939 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Nicolas commentedI guess we need to wait for the linux vpn app gets done so that linux os team goes to work on the linux drive app I hope. So maybe for 2048? or 2768? who knows
We request Features Parity!!!!!!!!!Nicolas supported this idea · -
3,112 votesNicolas supported this idea ·
Critical LINUX and if you are not sure yet I will write it again LINUX! just saying because you always forget (ignore) about us... Maybe as Flatpak and an AppImage?